ReviewJournal of tissue engineering
Review in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- The bone lid technique in lateral sinus lift: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of implant dentistry · 2022Pooled it
- Biodegradable Polyesters: Approaches to Increase Degradation Rates for Biomedical Applications.ACS macro letters · 2025Review
- Trends in bioactivity: inducing and detecting mineralization of regenerative polymeric scaffolds.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Highly porous phosphate-based glasses for controlled delivery of antibacterial Cu ions preparedRSC advances · 2023Article
- Oral cavity-derived stem cells and preclinical models of jaw-bone defects for bone tissue engineering.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- Poly (Ether-Ether-Ketone) for Biomedical Applications: From Enhancing Bioactivity to Reinforced-Bioactive Composites-An Overview.Polymers · 2023Review
- Highlights on Advancing Frontiers in Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022Review
- Efficacy of treating segmental bone defects through endochondral ossification: 3D printed designs and bone metabolic activities.Materials today. Bio · 2022Article
- Application of decellularized bone matrix as a bioscaffold in bone tissue engineering.Journal of biological engineering · 2022Review
- Synthetic materials in craniofacial regenerative medicine: A comprehensive overview.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Quality control methods in musculoskeletal tissue engineering: from imaging to biosensors.Bone research · 2021Review
- Review
- Spatio-temporal characterization of fracture healing patterns and assessment of biomaterials by time-lapsed in vivo micro-computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Comparison of bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human adipose-derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.Cell and tissue research · 2021Article
- Multiplexed Molecular Imaging Strategy Integrated with RNA Sequencing in the Assessment of the Therapeutic Effect of Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles for Osteoporosis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021Article
- Bioactive Glass: Methods for Assessing Angiogenesis and Osteogenesis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Human Teeth-Derived Bioceramics for Improved Bone Regeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Spatial frequency domain imaging for the longitudinal monitoring of vascularization during mouse femoral graft healing.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Mesoporous Strontium-Doped Phosphate-Based Sol-Gel Glasses for Biomedical Applications.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Article
- In vivo bone regeneration assessment of offset and gradient melt electrowritten (MEW) PCL scaffolds.Biomaterials research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone is a dynamic tissue that constantly undergoes modeling and remodeling. Bone tissue engineering relying on the development of novel implant scaffolds for the treatment of pre-clinical bone defects has been extensively evaluated by histological techniques. The study of bone remodeling, that takes place over several weeks, is limited by the requirement of a large number of animals and time-consuming and labor-intensive procedures. X-ray-based imaging methods that can non-invasively detect the newly formed bone tissue have therefore been extensively applied in pre-clinical research and in clinical practice. The use of other imaging techniques at a pre-clinical level that act as supportive tools is convenient. This review mainly focuses on nuclear imaging methods (single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography), either alone or used in combination with computed tomography. It addresses their application to small animal models with bone defects, both untreated and filled with substitute materials, to boost the knowledge on bone regenerative processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.