ArticleThe EPMA journal2019
Development and validation of nomogram estimating post-surgery hospital stay of lung cancer patients: relevance for predictive, preventive, and personalized healthcare strategies.
Article in The EPMA journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of prolonged hospital stay in patients with lung cancer undergoing sublobar resection.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Construction of a predictive model for prolonged length of stay in patients undergoing non-intubated thoracoscopic resection of lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Psychosocial factors influencing the outcomes after major anatomical lung resections: a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Shortness of breath on the day of discharge: an early alert for post-discharge complications in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Development and comparison of machine-learning models for predicting prolonged postoperative length of stay in lung cancer patients following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Article
- A novel model for predicting prolonged stay of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus: a 13-year (2010-2022) multicenter retrospective case-control study.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Cancer: A Review for Clinicians.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2022Article
- Shortness of Breath on Day 1 After Surgery Alerting the Presence of Early Respiratory Complications After Surgery in Lung Cancer Patients.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn the era of fast track surgery, early and accurately estimating whether postoperative length of stay (p-LOS) will be prolonged after lung cancer surgery is very important, both for patient's discharge planning and hospital bed management. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are very valuable routine examinations which should not be underutilized before lung cancer surgery. Thus, this study aimed to establish an accurate but simple prediction tool, based on PFTs, for achieving a personalized prediction of prolonged p-LOS in patients following lung resection.
methodsThe medical information of 1257 patients undergoing lung cancer surgery were retrospectively reviewed and served as the training set. p-LOS exceeding the third quartile value was considered prolonged. Using logistic regression analyses, potential predictors of prolonged p-LOS were identified among various preoperative factors containing PFTs and intraoperative factors. A nomogram was constructed and subjected to internal and external validation.
resultsFive independent risk factors for prolonged p-LOS were identified, including older age, being male, and ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC) ≥ 45.0% which is the only modifiable risk factor, more invasive surgical approach, and surgical type. The nomogram comprised of these five predictors exhibited sufficient predictive accuracy, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.79] in the internal validation. Also its predictive performance remained fine in the external validation, with the AUC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.60-0.79). The calibration curves showed satisfactory agreements between the model predicted probability and the actually observed probability.
conclusionsPreoperative amelioration of RV/TLC may prevent lung cancer patients from unnecessary prolonged p-LOS. The integrated nomogram we developed could provide personalized risk prediction of prolonged p-LOS. This prediction tool may help patients perceive expected hospital stays and enable clinicians to achieve better bed management after lung cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.