ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Predictive value of procalcitonin for infection of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Should Procalcitonin Be Included in Acute Cholecystitis Guidelines? A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Pooled it
- A Host-Clinical Integrated Prediction Model for Early Sepsis Risk in Diabetic Patients with Acute Infections: Development and Internal Validation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Risk factors for the prognostic effects of patients with pelvic abscesses: a clinical retrospective study.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Challenges following CRS and HIPEC surgery in cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: a comprehensive review of clinical outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- Detecting Diabetic Ketoacidosis with Infection: Combating a Life-Threatening Emergency with Practical Diagnostic Tools.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Serum procalcitonin improves diagnosis of infectious complications after CRS/HIPEC.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Serum Procalcitonin as a Predictive Biomarker in COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Cureus · 2022Article
- Serum Procalcitonin Levels in Postoperative Monitoring of Diabetic Patients with Posterior Lumber Vertebral Stabilization Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2022Article
- An immunogenomic signature for molecular classification in hepatocellular carcinoma.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2021Article
- The Relationship between Serum Procalcitonin and Dialysis Adequacy in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.Iranian journal of public health · 2021Article
- Clinical utility of procalcitonin in severe odontogenic maxillofacial infection.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2021Article
- Association of the systemic host immune response with acute hyperglycemia in mechanically ventilated septic patients.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of procalcitonin (PCT) for infection in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A retrospective analysis of 178 patients with T2DM who were divided into non-infection, local infection and sepsis groups was conducted; in conjunction with 33 healthy control patients. Clinicopathological characteristics and inflammatory indicators were compared between the four groups. Patients in the non-infection group exhibited significantly higher PCT levels compared with healthy controls (P=0.002). In addition, PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count and neutrophil percent were significantly different amongst patients with T2MD across different infection groups (all P<0.001) with the following rank order: Sepsis group > local infection group > non-infection group (all P<0.05). In addition, the following observations were made: i) PCT and CRP demonstrated larger areas under the curve (AUC) for predicting local infection (0.804 and 0.741, respectively); ii) PCT displayed lower sensitivity of only 21.8% at its classical cutoff value (0.500 ng/ml) whereas CRP exhibited higher sensitivity and specificity at 64.1 and 76.1%, respectively, at its classical cutoff value (10.0 mg/l); and iii) PCT exhibited the largest AUC (0.914) for predicting sepsis with high sensitivity and specificity (86.4 and 84.5%, respectively) at its cutoff value (0.990 ng/ml). Patients with T2DM without infection demonstrated higher baseline PCT levels. The present study clarified the value of PCT in predicting infection of T2DM patients. The application of PCT to predict local infection in patients with T2DM was identified to be inferior to CRP, but its ability to predict sepsis was concluded to be the best when compared with CRP, white blood cell count and neutrophil percent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.