ReviewFrontiers in genetics2019
Comprehensive Review of Models and Methods for Inferences in Bio-Chemical Reaction Networks.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Entropy-Based Approach to Model Selection with Application to Single-Cell Time-Stamped Snapshot Data.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Determining interaction directionality in complex biochemical networks from stationary measurements.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An Entropy-Based Approach to Model Selection with Application to Single-Cell Time-Stamped Snapshot Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Physics-informed AI with chemical master equation dynamics for driver-gene subclone detection and risk labeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Mathematical basis and toolchain for hierarchical optimization of biochemical networks.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Graph Structured Neural Networks for Perturbation Biology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- BioNetGMMFit: estimating parameters of a BioNetGen model from time-stamped snapshots of single cells.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2023Article
- Parameter Estimation for Kinetic Models of Chemical Reaction Networks from Partial Experimental Data of Species' Concentrations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- SBMLKinetics: a tool for annotation-independent classification of reaction kinetics for SBML models.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- LinChemIn: SynGraph-a data model and a toolkit to analyze and compare synthetic routes.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- DEGBOE: Discrete time Evolution modeling of Gene mutation through Bayesian inference using qualitative Observation of mutation Events.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2022Article
- Multiscale kinetic analysis of proteins.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- Two heads are better than one: current landscape of integrating QSP and machine learning : An ISoP QSP SIG white paper by the working group on the integration of quantitative systems pharmacology and machine learning.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2022Review
- Self-reproducing catalytic micelles as nanoscopic protocell precursors.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2021Review
- Kinetic Modeling and Meta-Analysis of theMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Systems Biology Will Direct Vascular-Targeted Therapy for Obesity.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Comprehensive Review of Models and Methods for Inferences in Bio-Chemical Reaction Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The key processes in biological and chemical systems are described by networks of chemical reactions. From molecular biology to biotechnology applications, computational models of reaction networks are used extensively to elucidate their non-linear dynamics. The model dynamics are crucially dependent on the parameter values which are often estimated from observations. Over the past decade, the interest in parameter and state estimation in models of (bio-) chemical reaction networks (BRNs) grew considerably. The related inference problems are also encountered in many other tasks including model calibration, discrimination, identifiability, and checking, and optimum experiment design, sensitivity analysis, and bifurcation analysis. The aim of this review paper is to examine the developments in literature to understand what BRN models are commonly used, and for what inference tasks and inference methods. The initial collection of about 700 documents concerning estimation problems in BRNs excluding books and textbooks in computational biology and chemistry were screened to select over 270 research papers and 20 graduate research theses. The paper selection was facilitated by text mining scripts to automate the search for relevant keywords and terms. The outcomes are presented in tables revealing the levels of interest in different inference tasks and methods for given models in the literature as well as the research trends are uncovered. Our findings indicate that many combinations of models, tasks and methods are still relatively unexplored, and there are many new research opportunities to explore combinations that have not been considered-perhaps for good reasons. The most common models of BRNs in literature involve differential equations, Markov processes, mass action kinetics, and state space representations whereas the most common tasks are the parameter inference and model identification. The most common methods in literature are Bayesian analysis, Monte Carlo sampling strategies, and model fitting to data using evolutionary algorithms. The new research problems which cannot be directly deduced from the text mining data are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.