Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31258450›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2019

A model for initiating research data management services at academic libraries.

Kevin B Read, Jessica Koos, Rebekah S Miller, Cathryn F Miller, Gesina A Phillips, Laurel Scheinfeld, Alisa Surkis

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Engaging health sciences librarians on data ethics: case study on a pilot curriculum.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Embracing the value of research data: Introducing the JCHLA/JABSC Data Sharing Policy.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Exploring data management content in doctoral nursing handbooks.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kevin B ReadNYU Health Sciences Library, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, kevin.read@nyumc.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-9036
Jessica KoosHealth Sciences Library, Stony Brook University, jessica.koos@stonybrook.edu.
Rebekah S MillerFalk Library, Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, rebekah.miller@pitt.edu.
Cathryn F MillerGumberg Library, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, millerc12@duq.edu.
Gesina A PhillipsHillman Library, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, gap64@pitt.edu.
Laurel ScheinfeldHealth Sciences Library, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, laurel.scheinfeld@stonybrook.edu.
Alisa SurkisHealth Sciences Library, New York University (NYU) School of Medicine, New York, NY, alisa.surkis@med.nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-2693

Funding

TEC - Training & Education Center SpplmtUG4LM012342 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI EPSTEIN, BARBARA A. · 2016 to 2021
$15.6M
Preparing Medical Librarians to Understand and Teach Research Data ManagementR25LM012283 · NLM · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI READ, KEVIN, SURKIS, ALISA · 2015 to 2016
$109k
NLM NIH HHS R25 LM012283NLM NIH HHS UG4 LM012342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLibrarians developed a pilot program to provide training, resources, strategies, and support for medical libraries seeking to establish research data management (RDM) services. Participants were required to complete eight educational modules to provide the necessary background in RDM. Each participating institution was then required to use two of the following three elements: (1) a template and strategies for data interviews, (2) the Teaching Toolkit to teach an introductory RDM class, or (3) strategies for hosting a data class series. CASE PRESENTATION: Six libraries participated in the pilot, with between two and eight librarians participating from each institution. Librarians from each institution completed the online training modules. Each institution conducted between six and fifteen data interviews, which helped build connections with researchers, and taught between one and five introductory RDM classes. All classes received very positive evaluations from attendees. Two libraries conducted a data series, with one bringing in instructors from outside the library.

conclusionThe pilot program proved successful in helping participating librarians learn about and engage with their research communities, jump-start their teaching of RDM, and develop institutional partnerships around RDM services. The practical, hands-on approach of this pilot proved to be successful in helping libraries with different environments establish RDM services. The success of this pilot provides a proven path forward for libraries that are developing data services at their own institutions.

Indexed as

AdultBiomedical ResearchData ManagementFemaleHumansLibrariansLibraries, MedicalLibrary ServicesMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsResearch PersonnelUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31258450
PMCPMC6579580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.