ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2019
Involvement of information professionals in patient- and family-centered care initiatives: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Policy Recommendations for Information Prescribing to Heart Failure Patients to Reduce Readmissions, Mortality, and Costs.Journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Systematic librarian-led zip code analysis to target underserved communities.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2025Article
- The medical librarian's roles in the patient education process: A scoping review protocol.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Person-centred care in primary care: What works for whom, how and in what circumstances?Health & social care in the community · 2022Review
- Transforming and extending library services by embracing technology and collaborations: A case study.Health information and libraries journal · 2022Article
- Family involvement on nursing wards and the role conflicts experienced by surgical nurses: A multicentre cross-sectional study.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2022Article
- Review
- Providing real-time resources in support of LGBTQ+ and HIV+ populations as information experts on the ECHO hub team: a case report.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021Article
- CHLA Standards for Library and Information Services in Canadian Health & Social Services Institutions 2020.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2021Article
- Nursing intervention to meet the family members' needs during the surgery waiting time.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2021Article
- Conducting Focused Outreach with Patient Populations.Journal of hospital librarianship · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe goal of this scoping review was to collect data on patient- and family-centered care (PFCC) programs and initiatives that have included the direct involvement of librarians and information professionals to determine how librarians are involved in PFCC and highlight opportunities for librarians to support PFCC programs.
methodsSystematic literature searches were conducted in seven scholarly databases in the information, medical, and social sciences. Studies were included if they (1) described initiatives presented explicitly as PFCC programs and (2) involved an information professional or librarian in the PFCC initiative or program. Based on the definition of PFCC provided by the Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care, the authors developed a custom code sheet to organize data elements into PFCC categories or initiatives and outcomes. Other extracted data elements included how the information professional became involved in the program and a narrative description of the initiatives or programs.
resultsAll included studies (n=12) identified patient education or information-sharing as an integral component of their PFCC initiatives. Librarians were noted to contribute to shared decision-making through direct patient consultation, provision of health literacy education, and information delivery to both provider and patient with the goal of fostering collaborative communication.
conclusionsThe synthesis of available evidence to date suggests that librarians and information professionals should focus on patient education and information-sharing to support both patients or caregivers and clinical staff. The burgeoning efforts in participatory care and inclusion of patients in the decision-making process pose a unique opportunity for librarians and information professionals to offer more personalized information services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.