Environmental and ecological factors influencing the spillover of the non-native kelp,

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Habitat Preferences at the Leading Edge of a Marine Bioinvasion.Ecology and evolution · 2025
   Article
2. Current Distribution of the Invasive KelpPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Article
3. Spatiotemporal variability in population demography and morphology of the habitat-forming macroalga Saccorhiza polyschides in the Western English Channel.Annals of botany · 2024
   Article
4. Urban rendezvous along the seashore: Ports as Darwinian field labs for studying marine evolution in the Anthropocene.Evolutionary applications · 2023
   Article
5. Identifying niche and fitness dissimilarities in invaded marine macroalgal canopies within the context of contemporary coexistence theory.Scientific reports · 2019
   Article
6. Population genomics of the introduced and cultivated Pacific kelpEvolutionary applications · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as