Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31258175›Full record

ArticleJournal of engineering mathematics2018

Modelling peeling- and pressure-driven propagation of arterial dissection.

Lei Wang, Nicholas A Hill, Steven M Roper, Xiaoyu Luo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of engineering mathematics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A Review on Damage and Rupture Modelling for Soft Tissues.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An incremental deformation model of arterial dissection.Journal of mathematical biology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei Wang2Department of Engineering, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE UK.
Nicholas A Hill1School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, University Place, Glasgow, G12 8QQ UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3079-828X
Steven M Roper1School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, University Place, Glasgow, G12 8QQ UK.
Xiaoyu Luo1School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, University Place, Glasgow, G12 8QQ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8753-4210
University of Glasgow · GBDurham University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An arterial dissection is a longitudinal tear in the vessel wall, which can create a false lumen for blood flow and may propagate quickly, leading to death. We employ a computational model for a dissection using the extended finite element method with a cohesive traction-separation law for the tear faces. The arterial wall is described by the anisotropic hyperelastic Holzapfel-Gasser-Ogden material model that accounts for collagen fibres and ground matrix, while the evolution of damage is governed by a linear cohesive traction-separation law. We simulate propagation in both peeling and pressure-loading tests. For peeling tests, we consider strips and discs cut from the arterial wall. Propagation is found to occur preferentially along the material axes with the greatest stiffness, which are determined by the fibre orientation. In the case of pressure-driven propagation, we examine a cylindrical model, with an initial tear in the shape of an arc. Long and shallow dissections lead to buckling of the inner wall between the true lumen and the dissection. The various buckling configurations closely match those seen in clinical CT scans. Our results also indicate that a deeper tear is more likely to propagate.

Indexed as

Arterial dissectionCohesive traction-separation lawCollagen fibresHGO constitutive lawTearWall bucklingXFEM

Identifiers

PMID31258175
PMCPMC6566306
OpenAlexW2769105790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.