ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2019
Angiopoietin-2 provides no incremental predictive value for the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease over N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Clinical Role of Angiopoietin-Like Protein 3 in Evaluating Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2020Article
- Angiopoietins, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors and Secretory Phospholipase AJournal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Angiopoietin-2 provides no incremental predictive value for the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease over N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUsing circulating biomarkers as a noninvasive method to assist the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) is beneficial for reducing the unnecessary diagnostic cardiac catheterization. This study aimed to assess the predictive role of angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) for the presence of obstructive coronary stenosis as compared with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with symptoms of CAD.
methodsThe study enrolled 222 consecutive symptomatic patients who underwent elective diagnostic cardiac catheterization from July to December 2018. Blood samples were collected in the first morning after admission. The severity of coronary stenosis was assessed by coronary angiography. The obstructive CAD was defined as stenosis ≥50% of the left main coronary artery or stenosis ≥70% of a major epicardial vessel (left anterior descending artery, left circumflex artery and right coronary artery).
resultsPatients with obstructive CAD (n = 120) had significantly higher levels of Ang-2 and NT-proBNP compared with those without. In multivariable regression analysis, only NT-proBNP levels were independently associated with Ang-2 levels. NT-proBNP was superior to Ang-2 as a predictor for the presence of obstructive CAD (NT-proBNP, area under curve [AUC] = 0.733, vs Ang-2, AUC = 0.626, P = 0.004). In multiple logistic regression analysis, NT-proBNP, but not Ang-2, was the independent predictor of obstructive CAD. The combination of Ang-2 with NT-proBNP did not provide the incremental value over NT-proBNP alone.
conclusionSerum Ang-2 levels are associated with NT-proBNP levels in patients suspected for CAD. NT-proBNP is superior to Ang-2 as a predictor for the presence of obstructive CAD. However, Ang-2 does not further increase diagnostic accuracy on top of NT-proBNP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.