ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019
[Corrigendum] Knockdown of lncRNA HNF1A-AS1 inhibits oncogenic phenotypes in colorectal carcinoma.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the publication of the article, the authors noted an error associated with the presentation of Fig. 3B. This Figure part showed the cell cycle analysis as determined by flow cytometry of HT29 cells transfected with either a HNF1A-AS1-specific siRNA or a negative control siRNA at 48 h post-transfection. An error was made in the compilation of this Figure, and the same data were inadvertently selected to represent the cell cycle analysis of both the HT29-SI and the HT29-NC cells (i.e., the data relating to the HT29-NC cells were included in the Figure twice). A corrected version of Fig. 3 is shown on the next page. Note that this correction affects neither the interpretation of the data nor the reported conclusions of this work. The authors all agree to this Corrigendum, and regret that this error went unnoticed during the proofs correction stage. They also wish to thank the Editor for allowing them the opportunity to publish this Corrigendum, and regret any inconvenience this error has caused. [the original article was published in Molecular Medicine Reports 16: 4694-4700, 2017; DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7175].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.