ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2019
The role of antimiR-26a-5p/biphasic calcium phosphate in repairing rat femoral defects.
Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Signaling Pathways and MicroRNAs in Bone Remodeling: A Narrative Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- MiR-20a promotes osteogenic differentiation in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells and bone repair of the maxillary sinus defect model in rabbits.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Surgical Classification for Preclinical Rat Femoral Bone Defect Model: Standardization Based on Systematic Review, Anatomical Analysis and Virtual Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Role of Epigenetic Functionalization of Implants and Biomaterials in Osseointegration and Bone Regeneration-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- DNA methylation of noncoding RNAs: new insights into osteogenesis and common bone diseases.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although miRNAs have been implicated in the osteogenic differentiation of stem cells, their role in bone repair and reconstruction in tissue‑engineered bone grafts remains unclear. We previously reported that microRNA (miR)‑26a‑5p inhibited the osteogenic differentiation of adipose‑derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs), and that antimiR‑26a‑5p exerted the opposite effect. In the present study, the role of miR‑26a‑5p‑ and antimiR‑26a‑5p‑modified ADSCs combined with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) scaffolds was evaluated in a rat femur defect model. The aim of the present study was to improve the understanding of the role of miR‑26a‑5p in bone regeneration in vivo, as well as to provide a new method to optimize the osteogenic ability of BCPs. ADSCs were infected with Lv‑miR‑26a‑5p, Lv‑miR‑NC, Lv‑antimiR‑26a‑5p or Lv‑antimiR‑NC respectively, and then combined with BCP scaffolds to repair rat femoral defects. Using X‑rays, micro‑computed tomography and histology at 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively, the quantity and rate of bone regeneration were analyzed, revealing that they were the highest in animals treated with antimiR‑26a‑5p and the lowest in the miR‑26a‑5p treatment group. The expression levels of osteocalcin, collagen I, Runt‑related transcription factor 2, Wnt family member 5A and calmodulin‑dependent protein kinase II proteins were positively correlated with the bone formation rate. Taken together, the present results demonstrated that miR‑26a‑5p inhibited bone formation while antimiR‑26a‑5p accelerated bone formation via the Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway. Therefore, antimiR‑26a‑5p‑modified ADSCs combined with BCP scaffolds may be used to construct an effective tissue‑engineering bone graft for bone repair and reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.