Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31257443›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2019

High-yielding rice Takanari has superior photosynthetic response to a commercial rice Koshihikari under fluctuating light.

Shunsuke Adachi, Yu Tanaka, Atsuko Miyagi, Makoto Kashima, Ayumi Tezuka, Yoshihiro Toya, Shunzo Kobayashi, Satoshi Ohkubo, Hiroshi Shimizu, Maki Kawai-Yamada and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shunsuke AdachiInstitute of Global Innovation Research, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Saiwaicho, Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan.
Yu TanakaJapan Science and Technology Agency, Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology, Kawaguchi, Japan.
Atsuko MiyagiGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama, Japan.
Makoto KashimaResearch Institute for Food and Agriculture, Ryukoku University, Yokotani, Seta Oe-cho, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Ayumi TezukaResearch Institute for Food and Agriculture, Ryukoku University, Yokotani, Seta Oe-cho, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Yoshihiro ToyaDepartment of Bioinformatic Engineering, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Shunzo KobayashiGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Satoshi OhkuboInstitute of Global Innovation Research, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Saiwaicho, Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi ShimizuDepartment of Bioinformatic Engineering, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Maki Kawai-YamadaGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama, Japan.
Rowan F SageDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Atsushi J NaganoJapan Science and Technology Agency, Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology, Kawaguchi, Japan.
Wataru YamoriJapan Science and Technology Agency, Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology, Kawaguchi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaves within crop canopies experience variable light over the course of a day, which greatly affects photosynthesis and crop productivity. Little is known about the mechanisms of the photosynthetic response to fluctuating light and their genetic control. Here, we examined gas exchange, metabolite levels, and chlorophyll fluorescence during the photosynthetic induction response in an Oryza sativa indica cultivar with high yield (Takanari) and a japonica cultivar with lower yield (Koshihikari). Takanari had a faster induction response to sudden increases in light intensity than Koshihikari, as demonstrated by faster increases in net CO2 assimilation rate, stomatal conductance, and electron transport rate. In a simulated light regime that mimicked a typical summer day, the faster induction response in Takanari increased daily CO2 assimilation by 10%. The faster response of Takanari was explained in part by its maintenance of a larger pool of Calvin-Benson cycle metabolites. Together, the rapid responses of electron transport rate, metabolic flux, and stomatal conductance in Takanari contributed to the greater daily carbon gain under fluctuating light typical of natural environments.

Indexed as

LightPhotosynthesisOryzaPlant LeavesChlorophyll fluorescencemetabolomephotosynthesisphotosynthetic inductionricestomatal conductancesunflecktranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID31257443
PMCPMC6793460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.