Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31256769›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2019

Psychometric Properties of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in Healthy Older Adults: Reliability, Validity, and Agreement with Standard Neuropsychological Tests.

Emmi P Scott, Anne Sorrell, Andreana Benitez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development and Validation of a Vocabulary Measure in the Mobile Toolbox.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Exploring symptom clusters in mild cognitive impairment and dementia with the NIH Toolbox.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emmi P ScottDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Anne SorrellAppalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA.
Andreana BenitezDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USAppalachian State University · US

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
White Matter Tract Integrity Biomarkers of Neurodegeneration in Aging and MCI Administrative SupplementK23AG044434 · NIA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BENITEZ, ANDREANA · 2015 to 2020
$914k
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)KL2TR000060 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$807k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000060NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NIA NIH HHS K23 AG044434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFew independent studies have examined the psychometric properties of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in older adults, despite growing interest in its use for clinical purposes. In this paper we report the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the NIHTB-CB, as well as its agreement or concordance with traditional neuropsychological tests of the same construct to determine whether tests could be used interchangeably.

methodsSixty-one cognitively healthy adults ages 60-80 completed "gold standard" (GS) neuropsychological tests, NIHTB-CB, and brain MRI. Test-retest reliability, convergent/discriminant validity, and agreement statistics were calculated using Pearson's correlations, concordance correlation coefficients (CCC), and root mean square deviations.

resultsTest-retest reliability was acceptable (CCC = .73 Fluid; CCC = .85 Crystallized). The NIHTB-CB Fluid Composite correlated significantly with cerebral volumes (r's = |.35-.41|), and both composites correlated highly with their respective GS composites (r's = .58-.84), although this was more variable for individual tests. Absolute agreement was generally lower (CCC = .55 Fluid; CCC = .70 Crystallized) due to lower precision in fluid scores and systematic overestimation of crystallized composite scores on the NIHTB-CB.

conclusionsThese results support the reliability and validity of the NIHTB-CB in healthy older adults and suggest that the fluid composite tests are at least as sensitive as standard neuropsychological tests to medial temporal atrophy and ventricular expansion. However, the NIHTB-CB may generate different estimates of performance and should not be treated as interchangeable with established neuropsychological tests.

Indexed as

AgingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsAgingAssessmentComparative studyMagnetic resonance imagingNeuropsychological testsPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID31256769
PMCPMC6733640
OpenAlexW2953946857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.