Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31256388›Full record

ReviewDermatology and therapy2019

Emerging Methods to Objectively Assess Pruritus in Atopic Dermatitis.

Mary Patricia Smith, Karen Ly, Quinn Thibodeaux, Thulasi Weerasinghe, Jashin J Wu, Gil Yosipovitch, Tina Bhutani, Wilson Liao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Digital Health Technologies in Pediatric Trials.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. How to measure itch in atopic dermatitis?The British journal of dermatology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Patricia SmithDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. mary.smith2@ucsf.edu.
Karen LyDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Quinn ThibodeauxDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Thulasi WeerasingheDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jashin J WuDermatology Research and Education Foundation, Irvine, CA, USA.
Gil YosipovitchDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Tina BhutaniDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Wilson LiaoDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USDermatology Research and Education Foundation · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

MHC and KIR Region Genomics in PsoriasisU01AI119125 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIAO, WILSON · 2015 to 2019
$3.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI119125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAtopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease with a chronic, relapsing course. Clinical features of AD vary by age, duration, and severity but can include papules, vesicles, erythema, exudate, xerosis, scaling, and lichenification. However, the most defining and universal symptom of AD is pruritus. Pruritus or itch, defined as an unpleasant urge to scratch, is problematic for many reasons, particularly its negative impact on quality of life. Despite the profoundly negative impact of pruritus on patients with AD, clinicians and researchers lack standardized and validated methods to objectively measure pruritus. The purpose of this review is to discuss emerging methods to assess pruritus in AD by describing objective patient-centered tools developed or enhanced over the last decade that can be utilized by clinicians and researchers alike.

methodsThis review is based on a literature search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The search was performed in February 2019. The keywords were used "pruritus," "itch," "atopic dermatitis," "eczema," "measurements," "tools," "instruments," "accelerometer," "wrist actigraphy," "smartwatch," "transducer," "vibration," "brain mapping," "magnetic resonance imaging," and "positron emission tomography." Only articles written in English were included, and no restrictions were set on study type. To focus on emerging methods, prioritization was given to results from the last decade (2009-2019).

resultsThe search yielded 49 results in PubMed, 134 results in Embase, and 85 results in Web of Science. Each result was independently reviewed in a standardized manner by two of the authors (M.S., K.L.), and disagreements between reviewers were resolved by consensus. Relevant findings were categorized into the following sections: video surveillance, acoustic surveillance, wrist actigraphy, smart devices, vibration transducers, and neurological imaging. Examples are provided along with descriptions of how each technology works, instances of use in research or clinical practice, and as applicable, reports of validation studies and correlation with other methods.

conclusionThe variety of new and improved methods to evaluate pruritus in AD is welcomed by clinicians, researchers, and patients alike. Future directions include next-generation smart devices as well as exploring new territories, such as identifying biomarkers that correlate to itch and machine-learning programs to identify itch processing in the brain. As these efforts continue, it will be essential to remain patient-centered by developing techniques that minimize discomfort, respect privacy, and provide accurate data that can be used to better manage itch in AD.

Indexed as

Atopic dermatitisDiagnosisEczemaItchPruritus

Identifiers

PMID31256388
PMCPMC6704205
OpenAlexW2956154159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.