Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31256362›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in elderly cancer patients.

B Fox, M de Toro Carmena, R Álvarez Álvarez, A Calles Blanco, C López López, S Pérez Ramírez, J Á Arranz, M Martín, I Márquez-Rodas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

B FoxMedical Oncology Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranón, Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain. bfoxclinicamedica@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8710-5475
M de Toro CarmenaMedical Oncology Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranón, Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
R Álvarez ÁlvarezMedical Oncology Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranón, Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
A Calles BlancoMedical Oncology Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranón, Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
C López LópezMedical Oncology Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranón, Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
S Pérez RamírezMedical Oncology Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranón, Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
J Á ArranzMedical Oncology Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranón, Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
M MartínMedical Oncology Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranón, Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
I Márquez-RodasMedical Oncology Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranón, Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is limited evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-/anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-based immunotherapy in the elderly, particularly those aged over 75 years. METHODS/PATIENTS: The clinical response and toxicity profile of anti-PD-1-/anti-PD-L1-based immunotherapy in patients aged over 75 years were assessed in this retrospective observational study conducted in the Medical Oncology Service of a tertiary level hospital. The associations among clinical responses, adverse events, and geriatric syndromes were evaluated.

resultsIn total, 20 patients aged between 75 and 94 years were evaluated. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab were the most commonly used drugs. A clinical benefit (stable disease, partial response or complete response) was documented in 13 patients (65%). This proportion was 80% in patients aged between 75 and 79 years, and 50% in those aged over 79 years (p = 0.236). The adverse events were similar to those reported in younger patients. At least one clinical adverse event (cAE) and one laboratory adverse event (lAE) was reported in 75% and 55% of patients, respectively. Polypharmacy was observed for all patients and multi-morbidity in 95%. Patients without gait disorders showed more responses to immunotherapy. The number of lAEs was significantly associated with the number of commonly prescribed drugs (slope = 0.218, p = 0.010), the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, and the number of cAEs.

conclusionsThe elderly can obtain benefits from anti-PD-1-/anti-PD-L1-based immunotherapy. The toxicity profile was similar to that reported in younger counterparts.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyMaleNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsEfficacyElderlyImmune checkpoint inhibitorsSafety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.