Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31256339›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2019

Comparing interspecific socio-communicative skills of socialized juvenile dogs and miniature pigs.

Linda Gerencsér, Paula Pérez Fraga, Melinda Lovas, Dóra Újváry, Attila Andics

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pigs as Pets: Early Human Relations with the Sulawesi Warty Pig (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda GerencsérDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. linda.gerencser@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7030-178X
Paula Pérez FragaDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Melinda LovasDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Dóra ÚjváryDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila AndicsDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

Magyar Tudományos Akadémia MTA-ELTE 'Lendület' Neuroethology of Communication Research Group (LP2017-13/2017)National Research, Development and Innovation Office (HU) NKFI KH 125527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research proves dogs' outstanding success in socio-communicative interactions with humans; however, little is known about other domestic species' interspecific skills when kept as companion animals. Our aim was to assess highly socialized young miniature pigs' spontaneous reactions in interactions with humans in direct comparison with that of young family dogs. All subjects experienced similar amount of socialization in human families. In Study 1, we investigated the appearance of human-oriented behaviours without the presence of food (Control condition) when a previously provided food reward was withheld (Food condition). In Study 2, we measured responsiveness to two types of the distal pointing gesture (dynamic sustained and momentary) in a two-way object choice test. In the Control condition of Study 1, the duration of pigs' and dogs' orientation towards and their frequency of touching the human's body was similar. In the Food condition, these behaviours and orienting to the human's face were intensified in both species. However, pigs exhibited face-orientation to an overall lesser extent and almost exclusively in the Food condition. In Study 2, only dogs relied spontaneously on the distal dynamic-sustained pointing gesture, while all pigs developed side bias. The results suggest that individual familiarization to a human environment enables the spontaneous appearance of similar socio-communicative behaviours in dogs and pigs, however, species predispositions might cause differences in the display of specific signals as well as in the success of spontaneously responding to certain types of the human pointing gestures.

Indexed as

DogsSocial BehaviorSwine, MiniatureAnimalsFaceFemaleFoodGesturesHumansMaleRewardSwineCompanion animalComparativeDogHuman–animal interactionInterspecific communicationPig

Identifiers

PMID31256339
PMCPMC6834752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.