Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31256152›Full record

ArticleMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2020

Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Patients Hospitalized during 2015-2017 in Hospitals in Poland.

Barbara Kot, Kamila Wierzchowska, Małgorzata Piechota, Agata Grużewska

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. New microbes and new infections · 2026
    Review
  2. Evaluation of in vitro activity of delafloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus MSSA and MRSA isolated from a Brazilian tertiary hospital.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phenotypic and Genotypic Analyses of Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antibiotic Resistance ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara KotDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, Poland, barbara.kot@uph.edu.pl.
Kamila WierzchowskaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, Poland.
Małgorzata PiechotaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, Poland.
Agata GrużewskaDepartment of Agricultural Experimentation, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, Poland.
University of Siedlce · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine antimicrobial resistance profiles of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from clinical samples from patients hospitalized during 2015-2017 in hospitals of -Masovian district in Poland. MATERIALS AND

methodsAntimicrobial resistance of 112 MRSA isolates was tested with a disc diffusion method. Isolates were examined for methicillin resistance using a 30 µg cefoxitin disk. Resistance was confirmed by PCR detection of the mecA gene. PCR was also used to determine spa gene polymorphism in X-region.

resultsA large number of MRSA isolates showed resistance to levofloxacin (83.9%), ciprofloxacin (83%), erythromycin (77.7%) and clindamycin (72.3%). A lower number of MRSA isolates showed resistance to tetracycline (10.7%), amikacin (14.2%), gentamicin and trimethoprim with sulfamethoxazole (8.0%). None of the MRSA isolates were resistant to linezolid and teicoplanin. Among MRSA isolates, 92.9% were multidrug-resistant (MDR). Resistance to erythromycin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin was the most common resistance pattern among MDR MRSA isolates. The highest number of isolates was resistant to 4 groups of antimicrobials (53.8%). The number of drugs to which MRSA isolates were resistant in 2017 was significantly higher than that in 2016 (p = 0.002). The size polymorphism analysis of X fragment of the spa gene revealed high genetic diversity of the investigated group MRSA isolates.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that in the hospital environment, MRSA isolates can quickly acquire new antimicrobial resistance determinants and that knowledge of current resistance patterns is important for the effective treatment of infections caused by MDR MRSA.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHospitalsHumansInpatientsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolandStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusMultidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureusSpa types

Identifiers

PMID31256152
PMCPMC7024858
OpenAlexW2954305423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.