Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31255878›Full record

ArticleJournal of plant physiology2019

Genetic architecture of glucosinolate variation in Brassica napus.

Varanya Kittipol, Zhesi He, Lihong Wang, Tim Doheny-Adams, Swen Langer, Ian Bancroft

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plant physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Biodiversity and genetic improvement ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. A naturally occurring promoter variation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perspectives for integrated insect pest protection in oilseed rape breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  11. Genome-wide association mapping within a localPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. RNA Sequencing ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Varanya KittipolDepartment of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Zhesi HeDepartment of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Lihong WangDepartment of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Tim Doheny-AdamsDepartment of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Swen LangerDepartment of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Ian BancroftDepartment of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. Electronic address: ian.bancroft@york.ac.uk.
University of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diverse biological activities of glucosinolate (GSL) hydrolysis products play significant biological and economical roles in the defense system and nutritional qualities of Brassica napus (oilseed rape). Yet, genomic-based study of the B. napus GSL regulatory mechanisms are scarce due to the complexity of working with polyploid species. To address these challenges, we used transcriptome-based GWAS approach, Associative Transcriptomics (AT), across a diversity panel of 288 B. napus genotypes to uncover the underlying genetic basis controlling quantitative variation of GSLs in B. napus vegetative tissues. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and gene expression markers (GEMs) associations identify orthologues of MYB28/HAG1 (AT5G61420), specifically the copies on chromosome A9 and C2, to be the key regulators of aliphatic GSL variation in leaves. We show that the positive correlation observed between aliphatic GSLs in seed and leaf is due to the amount synthesized, as controlled by Bna.HAG1.A9 and Bna.HAG1.C2, rather than by variation in the transport processes. In addition, AT and differential expression analysis in root tissues implicate an orthologue of MYB29/HAG3 (AT5G07690), Bna.HAG3.A3, as controlling root aromatic GSL variation. Based on the root expression data we also propose Bna.MAM3.A3 to have a role in controlling phenylalanine chain elongation for aromatic GSL biosynthesis. This work uncovers a regulator of homophenylalanine-derived aromatic GSLs and implicates the shared biosynthetic pathways between aliphatic and aromatic GSLs.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideTranscriptomeBrassica napusGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyGlucosinolatesPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsGenetic MarkersGlucosinolatesPlant ProteinsBrassica napusGlucosinolatesHAG1HAG3

Identifiers

PMID31255878
PMCPMC6739596
OpenAlexW2952795098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.