Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31255273›Full record

ArticleJournal of dairy science2019

An investigation of dairy calf management practices, colostrum quality, failure of transfer of passive immunity, and occurrence of enteropathogens among Australian dairy farms.

Angel Abuelo, Peter Havrlant, Natalie Wood, Marta Hernandez-Jover

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dairy science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angel AbueloDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, 736 Wilson Rd., East Lansing 48824; School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga NSW 2650, Australia; Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University and NSW Department of Primary Industries, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga NSW 2650, Australia. Electronic address: abuelo@msu.edu.
Peter HavrlantWagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Private Mail Bag, Wagga Wagga NSW 2650, Australia.
Natalie WoodSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga NSW 2650, Australia.
Marta Hernandez-JoverSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga NSW 2650, Australia; Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University and NSW Department of Primary Industries, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga NSW 2650, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calf preweaning morbidity and mortality risks have been reported as high in several countries, with average values approximating 35 and 7%, respectively. However, limited data are available for calf morbidity and mortality risks on Australian dairy farms. The aims of this study were (1) to investigate current calf management practices on dairy farms in Australia and their association with herd-level morbidity and mortality using a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study; and (2) to estimate the prevalence of common enteropathogens causing diarrhea, the failure of passive transfer of immunity, and poor colostrum quality in a sample of Australian dairy farms. We analyzed 106 completed questionnaires and samples from 23 farms (202 fecal, 253 calf serum, and 221 colostrum samples). Morbidity and mortality risks reported by farmers in preweaned heifers were 23.8 and 5.6%, respectively. These risks were above the Australian dairy industry targets in 75.5 and 66.7% of respondents. The zoonotic pathogens Cryptosporidium spp. and Salmonella spp. were the most prevalent enteropathogens, with a true prevalence of 40.9 and 25.2%, respectively. Salmonella O-group D was present in 67.9% of Salmonella-positive samples, followed by O-groups B (17.9%) and C (10.7%). Failure of transfer of passive immunity (IgG <10 g/L) was observed in 41.9% of calves (mean herd-level prevalence of 36.2%), and only 19.5% of colostrum samples met the standards for immunoglobulin content and microbiological quality. Collectively, these data indicate that there is still considerable room for improvement in calf-rearing practices on Australian dairy farms, particularly with regard to colostrum management and feeding hygiene.

Indexed as

ColostrumDairyingAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAustraliaCattleCattle DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsFarmersFarmsFecesFemaleHygienePregnancyPrevalencecalf healthdiarrheaheifer rearingneonatal diseasereplacement

Identifiers

PMID31255273
PMCPMC7094663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.