ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2019
Predictive risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer in elderly patients over 80 years old: an analysis of 288 consecutive patients.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06204497 (The Safety and Efficiency of Stent-based Diverting Technique Versus Ileostomy in Rectal Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Safety and Efficiency of Stent-based Diverting Technique Versus Ileostomy in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Non-inferiority, Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in minimally invasive rectal surgery: risk factor or technical marker of complexity? A systematic review, meta‑analysis, and metaregression.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Pooled it
- Preoperative risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after colectomy for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2022Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of the role of diverting ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- Risk factors for postoperative complications after colorectal surgery in patients aged ≥ 80 years: A multicenter retrospective study.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Protective loop ileostomy or colostomy? A risk evaluation of all common complications.Annals of coloproctology · 2024Article
- Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Radical Surgery for 403 Patients with Colon Cancer over 80 Years Old.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Combined application of inflammation-related biomarkers to predict postoperative complications of rectal cancer patients: a retrospective study by machine learning analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Review
- Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as an Early Predictor of Symptomatic Anastomotic Leakage in Patients after Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- A novel nomogram for anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective study.PeerJ · 2022Article
- Short and long-term outcomes of elderly patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection with primary anastomosis for cancer.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Sigmoidectomy following sigmoid volvulus: who is at risk of anastomotic failure?Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Article
- Risk factors of symptomatic anastomotic leakage and its impacts on a long-term survival after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Current Treatment Approaches and Outcomes in the Management of Rectal Cancer Above the Age of 80.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- Nomogram for Predicting Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients with Dysfunctional Stomata.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Clinical and morphopathological assay in vulvovaginal candidiasis.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
- The histopathological features and their prognostic impact in the postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer patients.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leakage (AL) is a common complication after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Few studies have been conducted to determine whether the traditional predictors of AL can be applied to elderly patients (age ≥ 80) undergoing anterior resection (AR) or low anterior resection (LAR) of rectal cancer. This study was designed to explore the predictive factors for AL after anterior resection of rectal cancer in patients over 80 years old.
methodsFrom January 2007 to May 2019, consecutive elderly (age ≥ 80) rectal cancer patients undergoing AR or LAR at our institution were systematically reviewed. The general information, perioperative outcomes, and comorbidities were collected.
resultsA total of 288 consecutive patients were included in this study. The average age was 82.8 ± 2.4 years, and 30 (10.4%) patients developed AL. The univariate analyses showed that neoadjuvant therapy (50.0% vs. 27.9%, P = 0.013), the number of stapler firings ≥ 3 (60.0% vs. 36.0%, P = 0.011), and coronary heart disease (CHD) (46.7% vs. 17.8%, P < 0.001) were associated with an increased incidence of AL. The multivariate analysis showed that the number of stapler firings ≥ 3 (OR = 4.77, 95% CI = 1.33-15.21, P = 0.035) and CHD (OR = 8.33, 95% CI = 1.94-13.05, P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for AL.
conclusionThe number of stapler firings ≥ 3 and CHD were independent risk factors for AL in elderly patients (age ≥ 80) with rectal cancer. A temporary ileostomy or the Hartmann procedure is recommended for patients with CHD, male patients, patients considered to be obese, and patients with a lower tumor location, which may increase the number of stapler firings. Certainly, we recommend that the number of stapler firings should be minimized to alleviate the economic and physical burden of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.