ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2019
Scaling methods for accelerating kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of chemical reaction networks.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Model-based optimization of combination protocols for irradiation-insensitive cancers.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Various kinetic Monte Carlo algorithms become inefficient when some of the population sizes in a system are large, which gives rise to a large number of reaction events per unit time. Here, we present a new acceleration algorithm based on adaptive and heterogeneous scaling of reaction rates and stoichiometric coefficients. The algorithm is conceptually related to the commonly used idea of accelerating a stochastic simulation by considering a subvolume λΩ (0 < λ < 1) within a system of interest, which reduces the number of reaction events per unit time occurring in a simulation by a factor 1/λ at the cost of greater error in unbiased estimates of first moments and biased overestimates of second moments. Our new approach offers two unique benefits. First, scaling is adaptive and heterogeneous, which eliminates the pitfall of overaggressive scaling. Second, there is no need for an a priori classification of populations as discrete or continuous (as in a hybrid method), which is problematic when discreteness of a chemical species changes during a simulation. The method requires specification of only a single algorithmic parameter, N
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.