ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019
Prolonged Capecitabine Chemotherapy Following Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX) Regimen Chemotherapy Failed to Improve Survival of Stage III Colorectal Cancer After Radical Resection.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of hand-foot syndrome following chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Pooled it
- Is there an efficacy-effectiveness gap between randomized controlled trials and real-world studies in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Drug-Drug Interactions of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid and Oxaliplatin and Its Activity in Colorectal Carcinoma Treatment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is considered to be a worldwide health problem because of its increasing incidence and prevalence. Surgery offers an opportunity for cure, but the postoperative recurrence rate is still high despite the advancement of chemotherapy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of prolonged capecitabine chemotherapy following CAPOX chemotherapy for stage III CRC after radical surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study included 212 patients with stage III CRC undergoing open radical surgery from July 2010 to June 2015. Among those patients, 104 patients received prolonged capecitabine chemotherapy (prolonged group) following 8 cycles of CAPOX regimen chemotherapy, while the other 108 patients (control group) received no prolonged chemotherapy. The prolonged chemotherapy consisted of capecitabine (1000 mg/m² per day for 2 weeks) and was repeated every 3 weeks for 8 cycles at most. Long-term survival and toxicities were retrospectively compared. RESULTS Patient characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups. For all patients, no significant difference was found in the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.7775) or 3-year overall survival (OS) rates between the 2 groups (P=0.5787). The prolonged group had significantly higher frequency of hand-foot syndrome (P=0.0267) and paresthesia (P=0.0164). In further subgroup analyses, no benefit for 3-year DFS or 3-year OS of prolonged capecitabine chemotherapy was found in colon cancer or rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged capecitabine chemotherapy following CAPOX regimen chemotherapy failed to improve the survival of patients with stage III CRC after radical surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.