Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31254338›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2019

Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review.

Jone Bjornestad, Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad, Henrik Berg, Larry Davidson, Inge Joa, Jan Olav Johannessen, Ingrid Melle, Helen J Stain, Ståle Pallesen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Affective lability and social functioning in severe mental disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Rethinking Social Interaction: Empirical Model Development.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jone Bjornestad *Department of Social Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0381-1741
Wenche Ten Velden HegelstadNetwork for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-8825
Henrik BergNorsk Lærer Akademi, University College, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4197-447X
Larry DavidsonSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1183-8047
Inge JoaNetwork for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5516-2336
Jan Olav JohannessenNetwork for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7740-8168
Ingrid MelleNorwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9783-548X
Helen J StainSchool of Social and Health Sciences, Leeds Trinity University, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5810-4780
Ståle PallesenDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5831-0840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with psychosis are heavy consumers of social media. It is unknown to what degree measures of social functioning include measures of online social activity.

objectiveTo examine the inclusion of social media activity in measures of social functioning in psychosis and ultrahigh risk (UHR) for psychosis.

methodsTwo independent authors conducted a search using the following electronic databases: Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. The included articles were required to meet all of the following criteria: (1) an empirical study published in the English language in a peer-reviewed journal; (2) the study included a measure of objective or subjective offline (ie, non-Web-mediated contact) and/or online social functioning (ie, Web-mediated contact); (3) the social functioning measure had to be used in samples meeting criteria (ie, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or International Classification of Diseases) for a psychotic disorder or UHR for psychosis; and (4) the study was published between January 2004 and February 2019. Facebook was launched as the first large-scale social media platform in 2004 and, therefore, it is highly improbable that studies conducted prior to 2004 would have included measures of social media activity.

resultsThe electronic search resulted in 11,844 distinct articles. Full-text evaluation was conducted on 719 articles, of which 597 articles met inclusion criteria. A total of 58 social functioning measures were identified. With some exceptions, reports on reliability and validity were scarce, and only one measure integrated social media social activity.

conclusionsThe ecological validity of social functioning measures is challenged by the lack of assessment of social media activity, as it fails to reflect an important aspect of the current social reality of persons with psychosis. Measures should be revised to include social media activity and thus avoid the clinical consequences of inadequate assessment of social functioning.

trial registrationInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42017058514; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017058514.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorHumansPsychotic DisordersQuality of LifeSocial Mediaassessmentmeasurespsychosisschizophreniasocial functioningsocial mediasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31254338
PMCPMC6625220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.