Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31254336›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Feasibility of a Real-Time Clinical Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence Framework for Pain Detection and Localization From the Brain.

Xiao-Su Hu, Thiago D Nascimento, Mary C Bender, Theodore Hall, Sean Petty, Stephanie O'Malley, Roger P Ellwood, Niko Kaciroti, Eric Maslowski, Alexandre F DaSilva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Potential applications of artificial intelligence in pain management: a scoping review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao-Su HuHeadache & Orofacial Pain Effort Lab, Biologic & Materials Sciences Department, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1401-000X
Thiago D NascimentoHeadache & Orofacial Pain Effort Lab, Biologic & Materials Sciences Department, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0910-9005
Mary C BenderHeadache & Orofacial Pain Effort Lab, Biologic & Materials Sciences Department, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1988-717X
Theodore Hall3D Lab, Digital Media Commons, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1194-5443
Sean Petty3D Lab, Digital Media Commons, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6226-3434
Stephanie O'Malley3D Lab, Digital Media Commons, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0988-5522
Roger P EllwoodClinical Method Development, Colgate Palmolive, Piscataway, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3741-4309
Niko KacirotiHeadache & Orofacial Pain Effort Lab, Biologic & Materials Sciences Department, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8843-8231
Eric MaslowskiMoxytech Inc, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5431-3350
Alexandre F DaSilvaHeadache & Orofacial Pain Effort Lab, Biologic & Materials Sciences Department, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3138-7781
University of Michigan · USColgate-Palmolive (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor many years, clinicians have been seeking for objective pain assessment solutions via neuroimaging techniques, focusing on the brain to detect human pain. Unfortunately, most of those techniques are not applicable in the clinical environment or lack accuracy.

objectiveThis study aimed to test the feasibility of a mobile neuroimaging-based clinical augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI) framework, CLARAi, for objective pain detection and also localization direct from the patient's brain in real time.

methodsClinical dental pain was triggered in 21 patients by hypersensitive tooth stimulation with 20 consecutive descending cold stimulations (32°C-0°C). We used a portable optical neuroimaging technology, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, to gauge their cortical activity during evoked acute clinical pain. The data were decoded using a neural network (NN)-based AI algorithm to classify hemodynamic response data into pain and no-pain brain states in real time. We tested the performance of several networks (NN with 7 layers, 6 layers, 5 layers, 3 layers, recurrent NN, and long short-term memory network) upon reorganized data features on pain diction and localization in a simulated real-time environment. In addition, we also tested the feasibility of transmitting the neuroimaging data to an AR device, HoloLens, in the same simulated environment, allowing visualization of the ongoing cortical activity on a 3-dimensional brain template virtually plotted on the patients' head during clinical consult.

resultsThe artificial neutral network (3-layer NN) achieved an optimal classification accuracy at 80.37% (126,000/156,680) for pain and no pain discrimination, with positive likelihood ratio (PLR) at 2.35. We further explored a 3-class localization task of left/right side pain and no-pain states, and convolutional NN-6 (6-layer NN) achieved highest classification accuracy at 74.23% (1040/1401) with PLR at 2.02.

conclusionsAdditional studies are needed to optimize and validate our prototype CLARAi framework for other pains and neurologic disorders. However, we presented an innovative and feasible neuroimaging-based AR/AI concept that can potentially transform the human brain into an objective target to visualize and precisely measure and localize pain in real time where it is most needed: in the doctor's office. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/13594.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityAdultArtificial IntelligenceBrainFeasibility StudiesHumansPainPain MeasurementSpectroscopy, Near-Infraredartificial intelligencepainspectroscopy, near-infraredvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID31254336
PMCPMC6625219
OpenAlexW2943907261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.