ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019
Feasibility of a Real-Time Clinical Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence Framework for Pain Detection and Localization From the Brain.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential applications of artificial intelligence in pain management: a scoping review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Application, performance and limitations of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and prediction of oro-facial pain: a systematic review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning and Intelligent Diagnostics in Dental and Orofacial Pain Management: A Systematic Review.Pain research & management · 2021Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Orofacial Pain: Diagnostic and Predictive Performance Across Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Research status, hotspots and perspectives of artificial intelligence applied to pain management: a bibliometric and visual analysis.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Multilevel Pain Assessment with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Evaluating ΔSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Functional Near-Infrared Spectrometry as a Useful Diagnostic Tool for Understanding the Visual System: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A systematic review of neurophysiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation treatment of knee osteoarthritis alters pain-related fNIRS connectivity networks.Neurophotonics · 2023Article
- The Forefront of Dentistry-Promising Tech-Innovations and New Treatments.JDR clinical and translational research · 2022Article
- Digital biomarkers and sex impacts in Alzheimer's disease management - potential utility for innovative 3P medicine approach.The EPMA journal · 2022Article
- The role of neural artificial intelligence for diagnosis and treatment planning in endodontics: A qualitative review.The Saudi dental journal · 2022Review
- Unveiling the phantom: What neuroimaging has taught us about phantom limb pain.Brain and behavior · 2022Review
- Study Protocol of tDCS Based Pain Modulation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Under Chemoradiation Therapy Condition: An fNIRS-EEG Study.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Article
- The missing mechanistic link: Improving behavioral treatment efficacy for pediatric chronic pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- Decoding Multiple Sound-Categories in the Auditory Cortex by Neural Networks: An fNIRS Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Pain Management for Dental Medicine in 2021: Opioids, Coronavirus and Beyond.Journal of pain research · 2021Article
- Commentary: Managing Virtual Hybrid Psychiatrist-Patient Relationships in a Digital World.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Photogrammetry-based stereoscopic optode registration method for functional near-infrared spectroscopy.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor many years, clinicians have been seeking for objective pain assessment solutions via neuroimaging techniques, focusing on the brain to detect human pain. Unfortunately, most of those techniques are not applicable in the clinical environment or lack accuracy.
objectiveThis study aimed to test the feasibility of a mobile neuroimaging-based clinical augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI) framework, CLARAi, for objective pain detection and also localization direct from the patient's brain in real time.
methodsClinical dental pain was triggered in 21 patients by hypersensitive tooth stimulation with 20 consecutive descending cold stimulations (32°C-0°C). We used a portable optical neuroimaging technology, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, to gauge their cortical activity during evoked acute clinical pain. The data were decoded using a neural network (NN)-based AI algorithm to classify hemodynamic response data into pain and no-pain brain states in real time. We tested the performance of several networks (NN with 7 layers, 6 layers, 5 layers, 3 layers, recurrent NN, and long short-term memory network) upon reorganized data features on pain diction and localization in a simulated real-time environment. In addition, we also tested the feasibility of transmitting the neuroimaging data to an AR device, HoloLens, in the same simulated environment, allowing visualization of the ongoing cortical activity on a 3-dimensional brain template virtually plotted on the patients' head during clinical consult.
resultsThe artificial neutral network (3-layer NN) achieved an optimal classification accuracy at 80.37% (126,000/156,680) for pain and no pain discrimination, with positive likelihood ratio (PLR) at 2.35. We further explored a 3-class localization task of left/right side pain and no-pain states, and convolutional NN-6 (6-layer NN) achieved highest classification accuracy at 74.23% (1040/1401) with PLR at 2.02.
conclusionsAdditional studies are needed to optimize and validate our prototype CLARAi framework for other pains and neurologic disorders. However, we presented an innovative and feasible neuroimaging-based AR/AI concept that can potentially transform the human brain into an objective target to visualize and precisely measure and localize pain in real time where it is most needed: in the doctor's office. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/13594.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.