Trial reportMemory & cognition2019
Semantic relatedness and distinctive processing may inflate older adults' positive memory bias.
Trial report in Memory & cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Disentangling Aging and Mood Effects on Emotional Memory.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotional stimuli are often more semantically interrelated and relatively distinct than neutral stimuli. These factors can enhance memory for emotional stimuli in young adults, but their effects in older adults-and on the age-related positive memory bias-remain unknown. In the present article, we tested whether item relatedness and distinctiveness affect emotional memory in young adults (Exps. 1 and 2) and the positive memory bias in older adults (Exp. 2). In both experiments, participants studied positive, negative, and neutral pictures and performed free recall after 1 min and 45 min. To manipulate relatedness, the neutral pictures were either as highly interrelated as the emotional pictures ("related neutral") or lower in semantic relatedness ("unrelated neutral"). To manipulate distinctiveness, we had participants process the emotional pictures in either a relatively distinct manner (mixed condition), by studying emotional and neutral pictures at the same time, or in a nondistinctive manner (unmixed condition), by studying and recalling each picture category separately. Overall, higher semantic relatedness (i.e., related-neutral vs. unrelated-neutral pictures) increased memory in both age groups. Distinctiveness did not affect memory in young adults, but it did alter the positive memory bias in older adults. Older adults recalled more positive than negative pictures when the pictures were processed in mixed sets, but not when they were processed in unmixed sets. These findings were consistent across both test delays. This suggests that previous reports, which were often based on mixed designs in which item interrelatedness was not controlled, may have overestimated the size and/or robustness of the positivity bias in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31254177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.