Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31254152›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019

Development of a trigger tool for the detection of adverse drug events in Chinese geriatric inpatients using the Delphi method.

Qiaozhi Hu, Zhou Qin, Mei Zhan, Bin Wu, Zhaoyan Chen, Ting Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictive values of trigger tools for identifying adverse events in hospitalized patients using a medical record review: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiaozhi HuDepartment of Pharmacy of West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-1089
Zhou QinDepartment of Pharmacy of West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0065-981X
Mei ZhanDepartment of Pharmacy of West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Bin WuDepartment of Pharmacy of West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Zhaoyan ChenWest China Clinical Medical School, Chengdu, China.
Ting XuDepartment of Pharmacy of West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, China. tingx2009@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8727-9259
Sichuan University · CNWest China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Preventive Medicine Association Of Sichuan 2017KJFW01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The global trigger tool is a method of retrospective medical record review that identifies possible harm in hospitalized patients using "triggers". Elderly patients with multiple co-morbid illnesses are especially vulnerable to adverse drug events (ADEs) that have high prevalence rates. Objective The purpose of this study was to develop an appropriate trigger tool to detect ADEs in Chinese geriatric inpatients by combining a literature review with the Delphi method. Setting Chinese geriatric inpatients. Methods Two steps were used to develop the trigger tool. First, we conducted a comprehensive literature review for existing ADE triggers (adult or elderly) to form the initial triggers for the Delphi process. Second, a group of clinical experts, including physicians, clinical pharmacists and nurses, was established to score candidate triggers for utility according to the usefulness and feasibility of implementing triggers in clinical practice. Main outcome measures The frequency of the full mark, arithmetic mean and coefficient of variation of each trigger. Results An initial set of 51 triggers was selected by literature review for evaluation. The group of experts was composed of 18 clinical experts: 13 physicians, 4 clinical pharmacists, and 1 nurse. Based on the two-phase Delphi process, 42 triggers in five categories (laboratory index, plasma concentration, antidotes, clinical symptoms and intervention) were retained. Conclusion The 42-trigger tool was developed to identify ADEs in Chinese geriatric inpatients. A pilot study that tests the list of triggers to identify ADEs in Chinese geriatric inpatients is the next step for establishing a specific trigger tool for Chinese geriatric inpatients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsChinaComorbidityData Interpretation, StatisticalDelphi TechniqueDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleNursesPharmacistsPhysiciansPilot ProjectsAdverse drug eventsChinaDelphi methodGeriatric patientsGlobal trigger tool

Identifiers

PMID31254152
OpenAlexW2953966356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.