Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31254108›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2019

Role of Targeted Therapies in Management of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy.

Petros Grivas, Evan Y Yu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Expressions of PD-L1 and Nectin-4 in urothelial cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emerging biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma: Challenges and opportunities.Cancer treatment and research communications · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Petros GrivasDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. pgrivas@uw.edu.
Evan Y YuDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementDespite significant advances and the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors, metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is still very hard to treat and has poor outcomes. Deeper understanding of the molecular underpinnings of mUC has identified potential biomarkers, biologic drivers, and relevant therapy targets. However, targeted therapies in mUC have had significant challenges due to molecular heterogeneity, clonal evolution, and genomic instability, and have not improved outcomes so far. Despite that, recent technological developments, clinical utilization of molecular biology, and discovery of new agents with preclinical and early clinical activity have signaled a new age of experimental therapeutics in mUC. The more frequent use of next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue and cell-free circulating tumor DNA, combined with novel agents tested in clinical trials, provides promise. There is a plethora of agents being tested in mUC, including inhibitors of receptors and signaling pathways (e.g., fibroblast growth factor receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT/mTOR pathway), angiogenesis (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors), poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, immuno-oncology agents, cytotoxic agents (e.g., chemotherapy, antibody drug conjugates), and epigenetic modulators, among others. Two agents, enfortumab-vedotin (antibody drug conjugate) and erdafitinib (fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor), have breakthrough designation by the FDA, but are not approved as of March 2019. Novel combinations with various modalities and optimal sequencing of active therapies are being investigated in clinical trials. More sophisticated patient selection, discovery and prospective validation of predictive (and prognostic) biomarkers with clinical utility, and relevant clinical trial designs are important parameters in that context. Based on the above, there is high potential for targeted therapies to be added in the growing armamentarium of mUC, and possibly complement chemotherapy and immuno-oncology agents.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunoconjugatesImmunotherapyNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingSignal TransductionUrologic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorImmunoconjugatesBiologic therapiesBiomarkersBladder cancerPrecision oncologyTargeted therapeuticsUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID31254108
OpenAlexW2955327857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.