Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31254104›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2019

In vitro osteogenesis process induced by hybrid nanohydroxyapatite/graphene nanoribbons composites.

Luana Marotta Reis de Vasconcellos, Renata Falchete do Prado, Elisa Mattias Sartori, Daniela Baccelli Silveira Mendonça, Gustavo Mendonça, Fernanda Roberta Marciano, Anderson Oliveira Lobo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Research progress on biocomposites based on bioactive glass].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Engineering Functional Graphenic Materials for Bone Repair.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luana Marotta Reis de VasconcellosDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Sao Paulo State University, Av. Engenheiro Francisco José Longo, 777, São José dos Campos, SP, 12245-000, Brazil. luanamrv@gmail.com.
Renata Falchete do PradoDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Sao Paulo State University, Av. Engenheiro Francisco José Longo, 777, São José dos Campos, SP, 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5970-0464
Elisa Mattias SartoriDepartment of Surgery and Integrated Clinics, School of Dentistry of Araçatuba, Sao Paulo State University, Araçatuba, Brazil.
Daniela Baccelli Silveira MendonçaDepartment of Biological and Material Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Gustavo MendonçaDepartment of Biological and Material Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Fernanda Roberta MarcianoScientific and Technological Institute, Universidade Brasil, Rua Carolina Fonseca, 584 - Itaquera, São Paulo, SP, 08230-030, Brazil.
Anderson Oliveira LoboScientific and Technological Institute, Universidade Brasil, Rua Carolina Fonseca, 584 - Itaquera, São Paulo, SP, 08230-030, Brazil. lobo@ufpi.edu.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes combine high bend and mechanical strength, which is advantageous for many structural and biomedical purposes. Recently, some biomaterials, based on carbon nanostructures and nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp), have been investigated as bone substitutes in order to improve regeneration. The aim of this study was to access the expression of some RNA transcripts (involved in the process of osteoblast differentiation) by mesenchymal stem cells cultured over different nanocomposite surfaces. A multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) was firstly grown using chemical vapor deposition and then exfoliated using chemical and oxygen plasma treatments to obtain graphene nanoribbons (GNR). The hybrid composites nHAp/GNR were prepared using the wet method assisted by ultrasound irradiation with different amounts of GNR (1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 wt %). Five groups were tested in cell cultures. Group 1: synthesized nHAp; Group 2: synthesized GNR; Group 3: nHAp and 1.0% of GNR; Group 4: nHAp and 2.0% of GNR and group 5: nHAp and 3.0% of GNR. Real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions were performed, and all data was submitted to Kruskal Wallis and Dunn tests, at a significance level of 5%. As a result, three nanocomposites with different proportions of GNR were successfully produced. After cell culture, the expression of osteogenic genes demonstrated no significant differences among the groups and periods. However, bone morphogenetic protein II (BMP II), integrin binding sialoprotein (IBSP), and Osterix highest expressions were observed in the group containing 3.0% of GNR. In conclusion, our hybrid composites may be useful in bone interventions requiring mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into osteoblasts for healing.

Indexed as

OsteogenesisBiological AssayBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Cells, CulturedDurapatiteGraphiteHumansIntegrin-Binding SialoproteinMesenchymal Stem CellsNanocompositesNanotubes, CarbonOsteoblastsOxygenRNASp7 Transcription FactorStress, MechanicalBMP2 protein, humanBone Morphogenetic Protein 2DurapatiteGraphiteIBSP protein, humanIntegrin-Binding SialoproteinNanotubes, CarbonOxygenRNASP7 protein, humanSp7 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.