Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31254058›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019

[Neuroradiology in ophthalmology].

Marc A Brockmann, Heike M Elflein

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marc A BrockmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Neuroradiologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. brockmann@gmx.de.
Heike M ElfleinAugenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disorders of the visual pathway can be due to pathological processes that cannot be directly assessed or visualized by ophthalmological examinations. Cross-sectional diagnostic imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are frequently used to further assess the visual pathway. This article provides an overview of the principles of CT and MRI for the anatomical and technical assessment of ophthalmological disease processes. Additionally, a brief overview regarding the endovascular diagnostics with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and treatment of vascular disease processes, which can also impair the visual pathway at various points is provided.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyAngiography, Digital SubtractionCross-Sectional StudiesMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographyComputed tomographyDiagnostic imagingEyeMagnetic resonance imagingVisual pathways

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.