Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31254037›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

Prospective evaluation of the performance of [

Mohammad Abufaraj, Bernhard Grubmüller, Markus Zeitlinger, Gero Kramer, Christian Seitz, Andrea Haitel, Pascal Baltzer, Marcus Hacker, Wolfgang Wadsak, Sarah Pfaff and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Comparing the diagnostic value ofTranslational andrology and urology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. [Research progress on prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography imaging of prostate cancer].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Feasibility and Optimal Time Point of [European urology open science · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Diagnostic Accuracy ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammad Abufaraj *Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard Grubmüller *Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Markus ZeitlingerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gero KramerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Christian SeitzDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea HaitelDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pascal BaltzerWorking Group of Diagnostic Imaging in Urology, Austrian Society of Urology, Vienna, Austria.
Marcus HackerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang WadsakDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sarah PfaffDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Tomasz WiatrDepartment of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Collegium Medicum, Cracow, Poland.
Markus MitterhauserLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Applied Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at.
Markus HartenbachWorking Group of Diagnostic Imaging in Urology, Austrian Society of Urology, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATLudwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics · ATVienna General Hospital · ATJagiellonian University · PLUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the accuracy of [ PATIENTS AND

methodsIn a prospective study, 65 consecutive patients who developed BCR after RP underwent SLND after PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) between 2014 and 2018. Extended SLND up to the inferior mesenteric artery was performed in all patients. Regional and template-based correlations between the presence of LN metastases on histopathology and whole-body PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) results were evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) was also evaluated in relation to PSA level at the time of SLND.

resultsThe median age of the patients at the time of SLND was 65 years (IQR 63-69 years) and the median PSA level was 1.4 ng/ml (IQR 0.8-2.9 ng/ml). Before SLND, 50 patients (77%) had additional therapy after RP (26.2% androgen-deprivation therapy and 50.8% radiotherapy). The median number of LNs removed on SLND was 40 (IQR 33-48) and the median number of positive nodes was 4 (IQR 2-6). LN metastases were seen in 13.8% of resected LNs (317 of 2,292). LNs positive on PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) had a median diameter of 7.2 mm (IQR 5.3-9 mm). Metastatic LNs in regions negative on PSMA-11 PET had a median diameter of 3.4 mm (IQR 2.1-5.4 mm). In a regional analysis, the sensitivity of PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) ranged from 72% to 100%, and the specificity from 96% to 100%. Region-specific positive and negative predictive values ranged from 95% to 100% and 93% to 100%, respectively.

conclusionPSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) has a very good performance for the identification of LN metastases in patients with BCR after RP. The high diagnostic accuracy in the regional and subregional analyses demonstrates the potential of this approach to enable a region-directed instead of a complete bilateral therapeutic intervention. The performance of PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) is dependent on the PSA level and the size of the metastatic deposit.

Indexed as

OligopeptidesRadiopharmaceuticalsAgedEdetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPredictive Value of TestsProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptidesRadiopharmaceuticalsBiochemical recurrenceHybrid imagingPET/CTPET/MRIPSMA ligandSalvage lymph node dissection

Identifiers

PMID31254037
PMCPMC6667405
OpenAlexW2955558979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.