Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31253970›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2019

Fixed orthodontic treatment has an insignificant effect on clinical attachment level.

Hend ElSayed, Ahmed Elkhadem

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hend ElSayedOrthodontics & Pediatric Dentistry Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed ElkhademEvidence Based Dentistry Centre, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, Virtual Health Library, Google Scholar and ISRCTN registry databases.Study selection Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or retrospective non-randomised clinical trials on periodontal healthy human patients receiving comprehensive fixed appliance treatment were considered.Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using either the Cochrane tool for RCTs or the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool for non-randomised studies. A Paule-Mandel random-effects meta-analyses was conducted for clinical attachment loss. Results Nine prospective non-randomised trials involving a total of 335 periodontally healthy patients were included. The patients' average age was 22.6 years (range 11.4 - 42.1 years). Seven of the nine studies were assessed as being at moderate risk of bias. Orthodontic treatment was associated with a mean clinical attachment loss of 0.11 mm (95 %CI: 0.12 mm gain to 0.34 mm loss; P = 0.338, I2 = 99.6%), which was neither statistically nor clinically significant.Conclusions The findings suggest that orthodontic treatment might have little or no clinically relevant detrimental effect on the clinical attachment levels of patients.

Indexed as

Dental CareOrthodontic Appliances, FixedAdolescentAdultChildHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.