ArticleBritish dental journal2019
Dental associates' perceptions of their working environment: a qualitative study.
Article in British dental journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Work situation and prospects of recently graduated dentists in the Netherlands.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2021Article
- Supporting dentists' health and wellbeing - workforce assets under stress: a qualitative study in England.British dental journal · 2021Article
- Psychological distress and the perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK dentists during a national lockdown.British dental journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of dental associates and how these relate to their working environment.Methods Qualitative methodology was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 associates in the UK in early 2018. Participants were asked about their working experiences, professional autonomy and the improvements they thought could be made to their working environment. Interview transcripts were analysed using deductive thematic analysis.Results Three key themes were identified: 1) 'conditions', how associates view their working environment; 2) 'drivers', what associates believe drives their working conditions; 3) 'effects', how associates are affected by their working environment. There were differences between the working environments of associates working in corporate practice and those in independent practice. They relate primarily to decision-making and finances. While most associates enjoyed their job, a common factor that negatively affected associates was governance including the current NHS contract and actions of the General Dental Council.Discussion The results of this study indicate that associates and the profession face a variety of issues today. The effects this has on associates could contribute to the changes that are being seen in the profession and are explored using social psychology theories.Conclusion The findings of the study complement work demonstrating corporate associates to have lower levels of autonomy than their non-corporate peers and highlights that drivers vary between sectors. Social psychology theories indicate that the working environment could be affecting change in the profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.