Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31253917›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2019

Dental associates' perceptions of their working environment: a qualitative study.

Ellena O'Selmo, Victoria Collin, Penny Whitehead

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Work situation and prospects of recently graduated dentists in the Netherlands.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellena O'SelmoBritish Dental Association, Policy and Research, 64 Wimpole Street, London, UK.
Victoria CollinBritish Dental Association, Policy and Research, 64 Wimpole Street, London, UK.
Penny WhiteheadBritish Dental Association, Policy and Research, 64 Wimpole Street, London, UK.
British Dental Association · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of dental associates and how these relate to their working environment.Methods Qualitative methodology was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 associates in the UK in early 2018. Participants were asked about their working experiences, professional autonomy and the improvements they thought could be made to their working environment. Interview transcripts were analysed using deductive thematic analysis.Results Three key themes were identified: 1) 'conditions', how associates view their working environment; 2) 'drivers', what associates believe drives their working conditions; 3) 'effects', how associates are affected by their working environment. There were differences between the working environments of associates working in corporate practice and those in independent practice. They relate primarily to decision-making and finances. While most associates enjoyed their job, a common factor that negatively affected associates was governance including the current NHS contract and actions of the General Dental Council.Discussion The results of this study indicate that associates and the profession face a variety of issues today. The effects this has on associates could contribute to the changes that are being seen in the profession and are explored using social psychology theories.Conclusion The findings of the study complement work demonstrating corporate associates to have lower levels of autonomy than their non-corporate peers and highlights that drivers vary between sectors. Social psychology theories indicate that the working environment could be affecting change in the profession.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelProfessional AutonomyWorkplaceDecision MakingEmotionsHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID31253917
OpenAlexW2954295403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.