Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31253846›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Improved quantification of muscle insulin sensitivity using oral glucose tolerance test data: the MISI Calculator.

Shauna D O'Donovan, Michael Lenz, Gijs H Goossens, Carla J H van der Kallen, Simone J M P Eussen, Coen D A Stehouwer, Marleen M van Greevenbroek, Miranda T Schram, Simone J Sep, Ralf L M Peeters and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shauna D O'DonovanMaastricht Centre for Systems Biology (MACSBIO), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. shauna.odonovan@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2253-4903
Michael LenzMaastricht Centre for Systems Biology (MACSBIO), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gijs H GoossensDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Carla J H van der KallenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Simone J M P EussenDepartment of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Coen D A StehouwerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marleen M van GreevenbroekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Miranda T SchramDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Simone J SepDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ralf L M PeetersMaastricht Centre for Systems Biology (MACSBIO), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ellen E BlaakDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2496-3464
Natal A W van RielMaastricht Centre for Systems Biology (MACSBIO), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9375-4730
Theo M C M de KokMaastricht Centre for Systems Biology (MACSBIO), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ilja C W ArtsMaastricht Centre for Systems Biology (MACSBIO), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6462-6692
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Muscle Insulin Sensitivity Index (MISI) has been developed to estimate muscle-specific insulin sensitivity based on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) data. To date, the score has been implemented with considerable variation in literature and initial positive evaluations were not reproduced in subsequent studies. In this study, we investigate the computation of MISI on oral OGTT data with differing sampling schedules and aim to standardise and improve its calculation. Seven time point OGTT data for 2631 individuals from the Maastricht Study and seven time point OGTT data combined with a hyperinsulinemic-euglycaemic clamp for 71 individuals from the PRESERVE Study were used to evaluate the performance of MISI. MISI was computed on subsets of OGTT data representing four and five time point sampling schedules to determine minimal requirements for accurate computation of the score. A modified MISI computed on cubic splines of the measured data, resulting in improved identification of glucose peak and nadir, was compared with the original method yielding an increased correlation (ρ = 0.576) with the clamp measurement of peripheral insulin sensitivity as compared to the original method (ρ = 0.513). Finally, a standalone MISI calculator was developed allowing for a standardised method of calculation using both the original and improved methods.

Indexed as

Glucose IntoleranceInsulin ResistanceAdultAgedBlood GlucoseFemaleGlucoseGlucose Tolerance TestHumansInsulinMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalReproducibility of ResultsBlood GlucoseGlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID31253846
PMCPMC6598992
OpenAlexW2954727205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.