Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31253775›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Improving the diagnostic yield of exome- sequencing by predicting gene-phenotype associations using large-scale gene expression analysis.

Patrick Deelen, Sipko van Dam, Johanna C Herkert, Juha M Karjalainen, Harm Brugge, Kristin M Abbott, Cleo C van Diemen, Paul A van der Zwaag, Erica H Gerkes, Evelien Zonneveld-Huijssoon and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. PhenoSS: phenotype semantic similarity-based approach for rare disease prediction and patient clustering.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Gene regulatory networks in disease and ageing.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Patrick DeelenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5654-3966
Sipko van DamUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Johanna C HerkertUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-9102
Juha M KarjalainenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Harm BruggeUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kristin M AbbottUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4885-8124
Cleo C van DiemenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Paul A van der ZwaagUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Erica H GerkesUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Evelien Zonneveld-HuijssoonUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9503-6297
Jelkje J Boer-BergsmaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pytrik FolkertsmaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tessa GillettUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
K Joeri van der VeldeUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Roan KanningaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Peter C van den AkkerUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sabrina Z JanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Edgar T HoorntjeUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wouter P Te RijdtUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4852-9379
Yvonne J VosUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan D H JongbloedUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-ArtsUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Richard SinkeUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Birgit Sikkema-RaddatzUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wilhelmina S Kerstjens-FrederikseUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2528-2203
Morris A SwertzUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0979-3401
Lude FrankeUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 VB, Groningen, The Netherlands. Lude@ludesign.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5159-8802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnostic yield of exome and genome sequencing remains low (8-70%), due to incomplete knowledge on the genes that cause disease. To improve this, we use RNA-seq data from 31,499 samples to predict which genes cause specific disease phenotypes, and develop GeneNetwork Assisted Diagnostic Optimization (GADO). We show that this unbiased method, which does not rely upon specific knowledge on individual genes, is effective in both identifying previously unknown disease gene associations, and flagging genes that have previously been incorrectly implicated in disease. GADO can be run on www.genenetwork.nl by supplying HPO-terms and a list of genes that contain candidate variants. Finally, applying GADO to a cohort of 61 patients for whom exome-sequencing analysis had not resulted in a genetic diagnosis, yields likely causative genes for ten cases.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseTranscriptomeDatabases, Nucleic AcidGene Expression RegulationHumansModels, GeneticPrincipal Component AnalysisSequence Analysis, RNASoftwareUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID31253775
PMCPMC6599066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.