Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31253385›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2019

A new computerized tomography classification to evaluate response to Denosumab in giant cell tumors in the extremities.

Laura Campanacci, Andrea Sambri, Manuel Ricardo Medellin, Pietro Cimatti, Costantino Errani, Davide Maria Donati

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of giant cell tumors of the distal radius: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura CampanacciIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea SambriIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: andrea_sambri@libero.it.
Manuel Ricardo MedellinClinica Nueva, Bogota, Colombia.
Pietro CimattiIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Costantino ErraniIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Davide Maria DonatiIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to describe the cohort of patients who have been treated with Denosumab as neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery for aggressive giant cell tumor of bone in the extremities, to evaluate the radiological responses to Denosumab comparing Choi criteria and a newly described computerized tomography (CT) classification, and to evaluate the risk of local recurrence after intralesional curettage or radical excision.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 36 patients (20 females and 16 males; mean age at diagnosis 36 years (range, 18-64)) treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab therapy prior to surgery for aggressive giant cell tumor of bone in the extremities. The radiological responses to Denosumab treatment were analyzed on the preoperative images after the neoadjuvant course with the Choi criteria and with a newly proposed classification based on CT. All these images were independently reviewed by two of the researchers. Surgical intervention methods were noted and local recurrence rates were evaluated. The correlation between radiological response amount and local recurrence were analyzed for both Choi criteria and the new CT classification.

resultsDenosumab was administered for a mean of 21 weeks (range 7-133). Five patients also had a short postoperative course. According to Choi criteria there was a radiological response in 32 patients (89%), while the new CT classification identified responses in all the 36 patients (100%). The identification of changes after 7 weeks of treatment was higher using the CT classification compared to Choi criteria (p = 0.043 vs p = 0.462). The surgical interventions after Denosumab comprised curettage in 29 patients (74%) and resection in 7 (26%). Local recurrence was higher in patients managed with intralesional curettage than in those treated with en bloc resection (55.1% vs 0%, p < 0.001). At last follow up 19 patients (53%) required en bloc resections. Good responders to Denosumab (type 2C) had lower risk of local recurrence (p = 0.047) after either resection or curettage.

conclusionThe new CT classification evaluated more accurately the response to Denosumab. Our experience suggests that the requirement for radical bone resection remains high despite the use of Denosumab. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsDenosumabGiant Cell Tumor of BoneAdultBone Density Conservation AgentsClassificationCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOrthopedic ProceduresPerioperative PeriodPrognosisResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabArthritisCurettageDenosumabGiant cell tumourResection

Identifiers

PMID31253385
PMCPMC6819755
OpenAlexW2953531021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.