Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31253243›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health2019

Gender Differences in Demographic and Health Characteristics of the Million Veteran Program Cohort.

Kelly M Harrington, Xuan-Mai T Nguyen, Rebecca J Song, Keri Hannagan, Rachel Quaden, David R Gagnon, Kelly Cho, Jennifer E Deen, Sumitra Muralidhar, Timothy J O'Leary and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Insights Into Veterans' Motivations and Hesitancies for COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An extra X chromosome among adult women in the Million Veteran Program: A more benign perspective of trisomy X.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prospective study design and data analysis in UK Biobank.Science translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly M HarringtonMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: kelly.harrington@va.gov.
Xuan-Mai T NguyenMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rebecca J SongMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Keri HannaganMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rachel QuadenMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
David R GagnonMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kelly ChoMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer E DeenOffice of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia.
Sumitra MuralidharOffice of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia.
Timothy J O'LearyOffice of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia; Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
John Michael GazianoMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stacey B WhitbourneMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
VA Million Veteran Program
VA Boston Healthcare System · USVA Office of Research and Development · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USBoston University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

CSP VA G002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Department of Veterans Affairs Million Veteran Program (MVP) is the largest ongoing cohort program of its kind, with 654,903 enrollees as of June 2018. The objectives of this study were to examine gender differences in the MVP cohort with respect to response and enrollment rates; demographic, health, and health care characteristics; and prevalence of self-reported health conditions.

methodsThe MVP Baseline Survey was completed by 415,694 veterans (8% women), providing self-report measures of demographic characteristics, health status, and medical history.

resultsRelative to men, women demonstrated a higher positive responder rate (23.0% vs. 16.0%), slightly higher enrollment rate (13.5% vs. 12.9%), and, among enrollees, a lower survey completion rate (59.7% vs. 63.8%). Women were younger, more racially diverse, had higher educational attainment, and were less likely to be married or cohabitating with a partner than men. Women were more likely to report good to excellent health status but poorer physical fitness, and less likely to report lifetime smoking and drinking than men. Compared with men, women veterans showed an increased prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions, thyroid problems, gastrointestinal conditions, migraine headaches, and mental health disorders, as well as a decreased prevalence of gout, cardiovascular diseases, high cholesterol, diabetes, and hearing problems.

conclusionsThese results revealed some substantial gender differences in the research participation rates, demographic profile, health characteristics, and prevalence of health conditions for veterans in the MVP cohort. Findings highlight the need for tailoring recruitment efforts to ensure representation of the increasing women veteran population receiving care through the Veterans Health Administration.

Indexed as

Health StatusPhysical FitnessVeterans HealthAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersMusculoskeletal DiseasesPrevalenceSex Distribution

Identifiers

PMID31253243
PMCPMC7061933
OpenAlexW2953872438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.