ArticleBMC health services research2019
General practitioners' perceptions about their role in current and future heart failure care: an exploratory qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Geriatricians' perceptions on multidisciplinary heart failure care in Belgium an exploratory qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Implementing heart failure disease management in primary care: a mixed-methods analysis of the IMPACT-B study.BMJ open · 2025Observational
- Tackling Cardiovascular Care Deserts in Romania: Expanding Population Access in Underserved Areas.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Influence of research evidence on the use of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in primary care: an exploratory qualitative interview study.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Community pharmacists' perceptions on multidisciplinary heart failure care: an exploratory qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Mixed-methods evaluation of a multifaceted heart failure intervention in general practice: the OSCAR-HF pilot study.ESC heart failure · 2023Observational
- Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Current Status of Daily Clinical Practice in Indonesia.Cureus · 2023Article
- Use of regional transmural agreements to support the right care in the right place for patients with chronic heart failure-a qualitative study.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2023Article
- Opinion seeking behaviour of healthcare providers in ambulatory cardiovascular care in Germany: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The Path of a Cardiac Patient-From the First Symptoms to Diagnosis to Treatment: Experiences from the Tertiary Care Center in Poland.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Cardiologists' perceptions on multidisciplinary collaboration in heart failure care - a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of heart failure patients by general practitioners: A Delphi consensus statement.PloS one · 2020Article
- From guideline to daily practice: Implementation of ESC-guidelines considering multidisciplinary and non-pharmacological care in heart failure in three ESC member states, a case study.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA comprehensive disease management programme (DMP) with a central role for general practitioners (GPs) is needed to improve heart failure (HF) care. However, previous research has shown that GPs have mixed experiences with multidisciplinary HF care. Therefore, in this study, we explore the perceptions that GPs have regarding their role in current and future HF care, prior to the design of an HF disease management programme.
methodsThis was a qualitative semi-structured interview study with Belgian GPs until data saturation was reached. The QUAGOL method was used for data analysis.
resultsIn general, GPs wanted to assume a central role in HF care. Current interdisciplinary collaboration with cardiologists was perceived as smooth, partly because of the ease of access. In contrast, due to less well-established communication and the variable knowledge of nurses regarding HF care, collaboration with home care nurses was perceived as suboptimal. With regard to the future organization of HF care, all GPs confirmed the need for a structured chronic care approach and envisioned this as a multidisciplinary care pathway: flexible, patient-centred, without additional administration and with appropriate delegation of some critical tasks, including education and monitoring. GPs considered all-round general practice nurses as the preferred partner to delegate tasks to in HF care and reported limited experience in collaborating with specialist HF nurses.
conclusionGPs expressed the need for a protocol-driven care pathway in chronic HF care. However, in contrast to the existing care trajectories, this pathway should be flexible, without additional administrative burdens and with a central role for GPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.