Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31253145›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

A protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years.

Jonas Pedersen, Simon Oksbjerre Mortensen, Jan Duedal Rölfing, Rikke Thorninger

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03716661 (Operative vs. Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03716661 nacompletednot on this map

Operative vs. Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2018 to 2022Enrolled150ConditionsRadius Distal Fracture, Distal Radius Fracture, Radius Fracture DistalArmsORIF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Novel Instant 3-Dimensional Printing System for Postoperative Fracture Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonas PedersenDepartment of Orthopedics, Regional Hospital Randers, Skovlyvej 15, DK-8930, Randers, Denmark.
Simon Oksbjerre MortensenDepartment of Orthopedics, Regional Hospital Randers, Skovlyvej 15, DK-8930, Randers, Denmark.
Jan Duedal RölfingDepartment of Orthopedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rikke ThorningerDepartment of Orthopedics, Regional Hospital Randers, Skovlyvej 15, DK-8930, Randers, Denmark. rikkthor@rm.dk.
Aarhus University · DKRegional Hospital Randers · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistal radius fractures (DRF) are very common in elderly patients, who present at the Emergency Department. Surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation using volar locking plates is widely prevalent despite the lack of evidence proving its superiority to conservative treatment with closed reduction and plaster immobilization. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether conservative treatment is superior to volar plating in terms of number of complications and results in a comparable or superior functional outcome in patients ≥65 years.

methodsIn this single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial, patients ≥65 years with distal radius fractures will be invited to participate. A total of 50 patients per treatment arm is required to provide 80% statistical power at a 5% alpha level assuming a difference of 20% in complication rate between operatively and conservatively treated patients. Primary outcome measures will be complication rate, Quick DASH score (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), PRWE (Patient rated Wrist evaluation), and range of motion of the wrist. Secondary outcome measures will be grip strength, pinch gauge, pain, use of pain medication EQ5D score (European Quality of life - 5 dimensions), standardized radiographs. One year of follow-up is planned with data collection at the day of injury, after 2 weeks, after 5 weeks, after 6 months, and after 12 months. An intention-totreat and per-protocol analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: This prospective trial helps to clarify the best treatment strategy for displaced DRF patients ≥65 years.

trial registrationThis trial is approved by the Danish Scientific Ethical Committee (ID: 1-10-72-420-17) and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Trial registration number NCT03716661 ).

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsBone PlatesCasts, SurgicalConservative TreatmentDisability EvaluationFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsRadius FracturesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeComplicationsConservativeDistal radius fracturesElderlyFunctional outcomeVolar plating

Identifiers

PMID31253145
PMCPMC6599306
OpenAlexW2953817428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.