Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31253102›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2019

Danish general practitioners have found their own way of using point-of-care ultrasonography in primary care: a qualitative study.

Camilla Aakjær Andersen, Annette Sofie Davidsen, John Brodersen, Ole Graumann, Martin Bach Jensen

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04583670 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

How Point-of-care Ultrasound Affects the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Process in General Practice. A Prospective Follow-up Study in France

TypeobservationalSponsorSorbonne UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled655ConditionsPoint of Care Ultrasound
NCT06068595 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Contribution of Targeted Musculoskeletal Ultrasound to the General Practitioner's Overall Decision-making Strategy for Patients With Suspected Musculoskeletal Pathology: a Before/After Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2024 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsMusculoskeletal, AnomalyArmsmusculoskeletal ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Use of point-of-care ultrasound in rural British Columbia: Scale, training, and barriers.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla Aakjær AndersenCenter for General Practice at Aalborg University, Fyrkildevej 7, 1,13, 9220, Aalborg Øst, Denmark. caakjaer@dcm.aau.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-5933-748X
Annette Sofie DavidsenResearch Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, CSS, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John BrodersenCentre of Research & Education in General Practice, Primary Health Care Research Unit, Region Zealand, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P. O. Box 2099, DK-1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ole GraumannDepartment of Radiology, Radiological Innovation Unit, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark.
Martin Bach JensenCenter for General Practice at Aalborg University, Fyrkildevej 7, 1,13, 9220, Aalborg Øst, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners increasingly use point-of-care ultrasonography despite a lack of evidence-based guidelines for their appropriate use in primary care. Little is known about the integration of ultrasonography in general practice consultations and the impact of its use on patient care. The purpose of this study was to explore general practitioners' experiences of using ultrasonography in the primary care setting.

methodsAdopting an explorative phenomenological approach, we performed semi-structured interviews with general practitioners who used ultrasonography in their daily work. Thirteen general practitioners were recruited stepwise, aiming for maximum variation in background characteristics. Interviews were conducted at the general practitioner's own clinic. Transcription and systematic text condensation analysis began immediately after conducting each interview.

resultsThe general practitioners described using ultrasonography for both selected focused examinations and for explorative examinations. The two types of examinations were described differently for each of the following emerging themes: motivation for using ultrasonography, ultrasonography as part of the consultation, selection of an ultrasound catalogue, and consequences of the general practitioner's ultrasound examination. The general practitioners had chosen and integrated their own individual ultrasound catalogue of focused examinations as a natural part of their consultations. The focused examinations were used to answer simple clinical questions and they had a significant impact on the patients' diagnoses, clinical pathways and treatments. The general practitioners considered their own catalogue of focused examinations as their comfort zone. However, they also performed explorative ultrasound examinations outside their catalogue. These scans were performed to train, gain or maintain ultrasound competences or as explorative examinations driven by curiosity. The explorative ultrasound examinations rarely had an impact on patient care.

conclusionsThis study describes how general practitioners found their own way of using ultrasonography in general practice and selected a personal catalogue of ultrasound examinations that was applicable, relevant and meaningful for their daily clinical routines. This study may serve to inform implementation strategies in general practice by offering insights into central aspects that drive general practitioners' behaviours.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPoint-of-Care TestingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareUltrasonographyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsQualitative ResearchFamily medicineGeneral practiceImplementationInterviewsPoint-of-care ultrasoundPrimary careQualitative methodsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31253102
PMCPMC6599254
OpenAlexW2955726319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.