Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31252674›Full record

ReviewNutrients2019

Precision Nutrition and the Microbiome Part II: Potential Opportunities and Pathways to Commercialisation.

Susan Mills, Jonathan A Lane, Graeme J Smith, Keith A Grimaldi, R Paul Ross, Catherine Stanton

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan MillsAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland. susan.mills@ucc.ie.
Jonathan A LaneH&H Group, Technical Centre, Global Research and Technology Centre, Cork P61 C996, Ireland. jonathan@hh.global.
Graeme J SmithH&H Group, Technical Centre, Global Research and Technology Centre, Cork P61 C996, Ireland. graemejohnsmith@gmail.com.
Keith A GrimaldiEurogenetica Ltd., Burnham-on-Sea TA8 1HX, UK. keith.grimaldi@gmail.com.
R Paul RossAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland. p.ross@ucc.ie.
Catherine StantonAPC Microbiome Ireland, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Fermoy P61 C996, Co Cork, Ireland. catherine.stanton@teagasc.ie.
University College Cork · IETeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modulation of the human gut microbiota through probiotics, prebiotics and dietary fibre are recognised strategies to improve health and prevent disease. Yet we are only beginning to understand the impact of these interventions on the gut microbiota and the physiological consequences for the human host, thus forging the way towards evidence-based scientific validation. However, in many studies a percentage of participants can be defined as 'non-responders' and scientists are beginning to unravel what differentiates these from 'responders;' and it is now clear that an individual's baseline microbiota can influence an individual's response. Thus, microbiome composition can potentially serve as a biomarker to predict responsiveness to interventions, diets and dietary components enabling greater opportunities for its use towards disease prevention and health promotion. In Part I of this two-part review, we reviewed the current state of the science in terms of the gut microbiota and the role of diet and dietary components in shaping it and subsequent consequences for human health. In Part II, we examine the efficacy of gut-microbiota modulating therapies at different life stages and their potential to aid in the management of undernutrition and overnutrition. Given the significance of an individual's gut microbiota, we investigate the feasibility of microbiome testing and we discuss guidelines for evaluating the scientific validity of evidence for providing personalised microbiome-based dietary advice. Overall, this review highlights the potential value of the microbiome to prevent disease and maintain or promote health and in doing so, paves the pathway towards commercialisation.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeNutritional StatusAge FactorsAnimalsBacteriaDietary FiberFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansIntestinesLife ExpectancyMaleMalnutritionOvernutritionPrebioticsProbioticsDietary FiberPrebioticsgeneticsgutgut microbiomeimmunitymetabolic diseasepersonalised nutritionprebioticsprecision nutritionprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID31252674
PMCPMC6683087
OpenAlexW2953731588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.