Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31252603›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Slaughter of Pregnant Cattle in Denmark: Prevalence, Gestational Age, and Reasons.

Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Peter Sandøe, Stine Ulrich Kjølsted, Jørgen Steen Agerholm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Welfare of cattle during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Analysis of irradiated Argentinean fetal bovine serum for adventitious agents.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Søren Saxmose NielsenDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. saxmose@sund.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-2417-0787
Peter SandøeDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0397-3273
Stine Ulrich KjølstedDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Jørgen Steen AgerholmDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1653-4552
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Danish Veterinary and Food Administration NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The slaughter of pregnant cattle gives rise to ethical controversy. We estimated the prevalence of pregnant cattle, elucidated the reasons for their slaughter, and in light of our findings, discussed the ethics of sending pregnant cattle for slaughter. Among 825 female cattle >353 days of age admitted to a Danish abattoir, 187 (23%) were found to be pregnant. There was no apparent difference in the proportion of pregnant animals between dairy and non-dairy cattle. "Health"-related slaughter was most frequent in dairy herds (70%), whereas "production"-related slaughter was most frequent in non-dairy herds (63%). While many farmers considered it unethical to slaughter pregnant cows without a good reason for doing so, many dairy farmers identified animal welfare as an important parameter in the decision, which was typically when the general condition of the cow or heifer would make it difficult for her to pass through calving and subsequent lactation. The many pregnant animals sent for slaughter were often the result of deliberate choices. Non-dairy farmers often kept a bull with their female cattle, and in many instances, this resulted in the mating of cattle intended for slaughter. Although considered ethically problematic by many dairy farmers, the slaughter of pregnant dairy cattle was often considered better for the cow compared to a stressful lactation period.

Indexed as

cowDanishethicsgestation lengthpregnancyslaughter

Identifiers

PMID31252603
PMCPMC6681307
OpenAlexW2955038233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.