ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019
Mapping Variation in Breast Cancer Screening: Where to Intervene?
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of translated reminder letters and phone calls on mammography screening booking rates: Two randomised controlled trials.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Differences and similarities in breast and colorectal screening participation: a spatial and temporal analysis to reveal intervention areas, France.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of breast cancer screening across half a million invitations in Geneva, Switzerland.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Contextual and individual inequalities in breast cancer screening participation and outcomes in Turin (North-West Italy).NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Effect of GP visits in the compliance of preventive services: a cross-sectional study in Europe.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Environmental and geographical factors influencing the spread of SARS-CoV-2 over 2 years: a fine-scale spatiotemporal analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Exploring Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening: An Ecological Analysis of Australian Data.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Factors influencing participation in breast cancer screening in an urban setting. A study of organized and individual opportunistic screening among potentially active and retired women in the city of Nice.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Role of mammography accessibility, deprivation and spatial effect in breast cancer screening participation in France: an observational ecological study.International journal of health geographics · 2022Observational
- Using big data to gauge effectiveness of breast cancer awareness month.Preventive medicine · 2021Article
- Application of GIS Spatial Analysis and Scanning Statistics in the Gynecological Cancer Clustering Pattern and Risk Screening: A Case Study in Northern Jiangxi Province, China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small geographic areas with lower mammography screening participation rates may reflect gaps in screening efforts. Our objective was to use spatial analyses to understand disparities in mammography screening use and to identify factors to increase its uptake in areas that need it in Lyon metropolitan area, France. Data for screened women between the ages of 50 and 74 were analyzed. Census blocks of screened and non screened women were extracted from the mammography screening programme 2015-2016 dataset. We used spatial regression models, within a generalized additive framework to determine clusters of census blocks with significantly higher prevalence of non-participation of mammography screening. Smoothed risk maps were crude and adjusted on the following covariates: deprivation index and opportunistic screening. Among 178,002 women aged 50 to 74, 49.9% received mammography screening. As hypothesized, women living in highly deprived census blocks had lower participation rates compared to less deprived blocks, 45.2% vs. 51.4%
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.