Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31252542›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Relative Validity of a Food and Beverage Preference Questionnaire to Characterize Taste Phenotypes in Children Adolescents and Adults.

Hannah Jilani, Hermann Pohlabeln, Stefaan De Henauw, Gabriele Eiben, Monica Hunsberger, Dénes Molnar, Luis A Moreno, Valeria Pala, Paola Russo, Antonia Solea and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Taste Propensity in Obese and Nonobese Older Adults.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hannah JilaniLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Hermann PohlabelnLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Stefaan De HenauwDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Gabriele EibenDepartment of Biomedicine and Public Health, School of Health and Education, University of Skövde, 54128 Skövde, Sweden.
Monica HunsbergerDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Dénes MolnarDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7623 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3675-7019
Luis A MorenoGENUD (Growth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development) Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Valeria PalaDepartment of Research, Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5438-970X
Paola RussoInstitute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, 83100 Avellino, Italy.
Antonia SoleaResearch and Education Institute of Child Health, 2035 Strovolos, Cyprus.
Toomas VeidebaumDepartment of Chronic Diseases, National Institute for Health Development, 11619 Tallin, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-7659-8924
Wolfgang AhrensLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Antje HebestreitLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, 28359 Bremen, Germany. hebestr@leibniz-bips.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7354-5958
On Behalf Of The Idefics And I Family Consortia

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council 266044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the relative validity of our food and beverage preference questionnaire we investigated the association between sweet and fatty taste preference scores (assessed using a food and beverage preference questionnaire) and sweet and fatty food propensity scores (derived from a food frequency questionnaire). In I.Family, a large European multi-country cohort study, 12,207 participants from Cyprus, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain and Sweden, including 5291 adults, 3082 adolescents, and 3834 children, completed a food and beverage preference questionnaire with 63 items. Cumulative preference scores for sweet and fatty taste were calculated from the single item ranking ranging from 1 to 5. The relative consumption frequency of foods classified as sweet and fatty was used to calculate the corresponding consumption propensities, a continuous variable ranging from 0 to 100. We conducted regression analyses to investigate the association between sweet and fatty taste preference scores and sweet and fatty food propensity scores, respectively, separately for adults, adolescents ≥12 years, and for children <12 years. The overall sweet taste preference score was positively associated with the sweet food consumption propensity score (β = 2.4, 95% CI: 2.1;2.7) and the fatty taste preference score was positively associated with the fatty food consumption propensity score (β = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.8;2.2). After stratification for age (children <12 years, adolescents ≥12 years, and adults), the effect remained significant in all age groups and was strongest in adolescents and adults. We conclude that our food and beverage preference questionnaire is a useful instrument for epidemiological studies on sensory perception and health outcomes and for the characterization of sensory taste phenotypes.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorBeveragesChild BehaviorFeeding BehaviorFoodSurveys and QuestionnairesTasteTaste PerceptionAdolescentAge FactorsChildEuropeHumansPhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsadolescentsadultsEuropean childrentaste preference questionnairevalidation

Identifiers

PMID31252542
PMCPMC6682919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.