Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31252526›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Use of Online Dietary Recalls among Older UK Adults: A Feasibility Study of an Online Dietary Assessment Tool.

Heather A Ward, Heather McLellan, Chi Udeh-Momoh, Parthenia Giannakopoulou, Catherine Robb, Petra A Wark, Lefkos Middleton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Self-completed online dietary recalls as an alternative method of dietary assessment for dietetic outpatient appointments: A feasibility study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather A WardDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK. heather.ward@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2721-2404
Heather McLellanDepartment of Neuroepidemiology and Ageing, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.
Chi Udeh-MomohDepartment of Neuroepidemiology and Ageing, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7357-4692
Parthenia GiannakopoulouDepartment of Neuroepidemiology and Ageing, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.
Catherine RobbDepartment of Neuroepidemiology and Ageing, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.
Petra A WarkFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1020-4640
Lefkos MiddletonDepartment of Neuroepidemiology and Ageing, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the feasibility of including myfood24, an online 24-hour dietary recall tool, in a cohort studies of older adults. Participants (

Indexed as

Diet RecordsFeeding BehaviorInternetMental RecallAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingAttitude to ComputersFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studiescohortdietary assessmentdietary recallmyfood24older adultsonline

Identifiers

PMID31252526
PMCPMC6682978
OpenAlexW2954143659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.