Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31252282›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2019

Putting the brakes on the cell cycle: mechanisms of cellular growth arrest.

Lindsey R Pack, Leighton H Daigh, Tobias Meyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Repurposing Cell Cycle Oscillators for Multiciliated Cell Differentiation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsey R PackDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Leighton H DaighDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Tobias MeyerDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: tobias1@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007365 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHUA, KATRIN F · 1985 to 2021
$33.8M
TRAINING & OUTREACH COREP50GM107615 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FERRELL, JAMES E. · 2013 to 2017
$10.9M
Cell Signaling and Cell DecisionsR35GM127026 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI TOBIAS MEYER · 2018 to 2026
$8.5M
REGULATION OF CA++/CALMODULIN KINASE BY NEUROTRANSMITTERR01GM030179 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MEYER, TOBIAS · 1985 to 2018
$4.9M
REGULATION OF CA++/CALMODULIN KINASE BY NEUROTRANSMITTERR37GM030179 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MEYER, TOBIAS · 1995 to 2004
$1.7M
CV7000S10OD018073 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MEYER, TOBIAS · 2014 to 2014
$599k
Decision points to enter and exit the human cell cycleR01GM118377 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MEYER, TOBIAS · 2016 to 2017
$566k
Chromatin Dynamics in the Cell CycleF32GM125246 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PACK, LINDSEY RENEE · 2017 to 2020
$197k
Single-cell analysis of alterations in signaling dynamics that impair cellular proliferation during agingF30AG060634 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAIGH, LEIGHTON HARRISON · 2018 to 2019
$77k
NIA NIH HHS F30 AG060634NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM125246NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107615NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030179NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118377NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127026NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM030179NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007365NIH HHS S10 OD018073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise regulation of cellular proliferation is critical to tissue homeostasis and development, but misregulation leads to diseases of excess proliferation or cell loss. To achieve precise control, cells utilize distinct mechanisms of growth arrest such as quiescence and senescence. The decision to enter these growth-arrested states or proliferate is mediated by the core cell-cycle machinery that responds to diverse external and internal signals. Recent advances have revealed the molecular underpinnings of these cell-cycle decisions, highlighting the unique nature of cell-cycle entry from quiescence, identifying endogenous DNA damage as a quiescence-inducing signal, and establishing how persistent arrest is achieved in senescence.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell Cycle CheckpointsAnimalsCell ProliferationCellular SenescenceDNA DamageDNA ReplicationHumans

Identifiers

PMID31252282
PMCPMC7187785
OpenAlexW2954825544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.