ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2019
Examining individual differences in reading and attentional control networks utilizing an oddball fMRI task.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Related Changes in EEG Signal Complexity and Behavioral Variability from Childhood to Adulthood: A Multiscale Entropy Approach.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Combined accelerated theta burst stimulation and reading instruction for the treatment of persistent developmental dyslexia: methodology and preliminary findings.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Altered temporal organization of neural response dynamics during attention processing differentiates ADHD subtypes in children.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Interference of default mode on attention networks in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and its association with genetic variants and treatment outcomes.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- The reading-attention relationship: Variations in working memory network activity during single word decoding in children with and without dyslexia.Neuropsychologia · 2024Article
- Preliminary evidence of prolonged timing effects of theta-burst stimulation in the reading system.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Functional brain networks underlying the interaction between central and peripheral processes involved in Chinese handwriting in children and adults.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Cerebral blood flow characteristics of drug-naïve attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with social impairment: Evidence for region-symptom specificity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- How you read affects what you gain: Individual differences in the functional organization of the reading system predict intervention gains in children with reading disabilities.Journal of educational psychology · 2022Article
- Theory-driven classification of reading difficulties from fMRI data using Bayesian latent-mixture models.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Is that a pibu or a pibo? Children with reading and language deficits show difficulties in learning and overnight consolidation of phonologically similar pseudowords.Developmental science · 2021Article
- Individual differences in learning the regularities between orthography, phonology and semantics predict early reading skills.Journal of memory and language · 2020Article
- Development of Print-Speech Integration in the Brain of Beginning Readers With Varying Reading Skills.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to develop an fMRI task capable of characterizing individual differences in reading and attentional domains. Forty-nine students with a range of reading and attentional control abilities completed an event-related fMRI oddball task consisting of printed word and false font stimuli. Reading network activation was assessed by contrasting printed words with false font stimuli. Left inferior frontal gyrus and superior/middle temporal gyrus showed a main effect of stimulus type. The magnitude of the difference in activation between words and false font was correlated with word reading for both regions and reading fluency for superior/middle temporal gyrus. Regions including bilateral middle cingulate, insula and right inferior frontal gyrus showed a main effect of trial type. The difference in activation between oddball and standard trials in the right superior/middle temporal gyrus and left cerebellum was correlated with attentional control measures. Results indicate the task tapped both reading and attentional control resources. Understanding the contribution of the neural networks supporting each of these domains may provide insight into the shared neural deficits underlying the co-morbidity between developmental dyslexia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.