Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31251426›Full record

ArticleThe American journal on addictions2019

Brief Report: Low-Barrier Buprenorphine Initiation Predicts Treatment Retention Among Latinx and Non-Latinx Primary Care Patients.

Christina S Lee, Robert Rosales, Michael D Stein, Mariana Nicholls, Bridget M O'Connor, Vanessa Loukas Ryan, Elizabeth A Davis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal on addictions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Qualitative study of blister pack use during buprenorphine low dose initiation.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christina S LeeDepartment of Applied Psychology, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-2278-9888
Robert RosalesDepartment of Applied Psychology, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael D SteinDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mariana NichollsDepartment of Applied Psychology, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bridget M O'ConnorDepartment of Applied Psychology, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Vanessa Loukas RyanDepartment of Adult Medicine, South End Community Health Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth A DavisDepartment of Adult Medicine, South End Community Health Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Northeastern University · USBoston University · USInstitute for Community Health · US

Funding

ALCOHOL INTERVENTION/TREATMENT OUTCOME RESEARCH TRAININGT32AA007459 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT MIRANDA, PETER M. MONTI · 1986 to 2026
$13.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007459SAMHSA HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPatients are at risk of dropout while waiting for buprenorphine treatment. Study goals are to compare 3-month retention in two different methods to buprenorphine initiation among persons with opioid use disorder.

methodsWe compared 3-month treatment retention rates of low-barrier buprenorphine initiation (i.e., rapid induction) (n =58) or a traditional method of buprenorphine initiation ( n = 45) for persons with opioid use disorder seen at an urban community health center.

resultsLogistic regression revealed that low-barrier initiation had 11.11 greater odds of retention compared with traditional methods (p <0.001). Latinx patients benefited more than non-Latinx patients (OR = 14.79, p =.039). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsAll patients were more likely to be retained using low-barrier initiation. A significantly larger effect on retention among Latinx patients was observed. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Rapid buprenorphine initiation increases treatment retention which improves treatment outcomes for persons with opioid use disorder. Study findings support a less restrictive services model that is even more effective for Latinx patients. (Am J Addict 2019;28:409-412).

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersPatient DropoutsWaiting ListsAdultBuprenorphineFemaleHumansMaleMassachusettsNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentPrimary Health CareBuprenorphineNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID31251426
PMCPMC6706284
OpenAlexW2953589742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.