Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31251416›Full record

SynthesisConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2020

Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior.

Julie Whitburn, Wayne Linklater, Wokje Abrahamse

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A meta-analysis of the effect of visiting zoos and aquariums on visitors' conservation knowledge, beliefs, and behavior.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Meta-analysis of landowner participation in voluntary incentive programs for provision of forest ecosystem services.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nature Relatedness as an Orientation in Moral Psychology.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julie WhitburnSchool of Biological Sciences, Te Toki a Rata Building, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn Parade, Kelburn, Wellington, 6012, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6212-9860
Wayne LinklaterSchool of Biological Sciences, Te Toki a Rata Building, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn Parade, Kelburn, Wellington, 6012, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2627-693X
Wokje AbrahamseSchool of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Cotton Building, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn Parade, Kelburn, Wellington, 6012, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding what drives environmentally protective or destructive behavior is important to the design and implementation of effective public policies to encourage people's engagement in proenvironmental behavior (PEB). Research shows that a connection to nature is associated with greater engagement in PEB. However, the variety of instruments and methods used in these studies poses a major barrier to integrating research findings. We conducted a meta-analysis of the relationship between connection to nature and PEB. We identified studies through a systematic review of the literature and used Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software to analyze the results from 37 samples (n = 13,237) and to test for moderators. A random-effects model demonstrated a positive and significant association between connection to nature and PEB (r = 0.42, 95% CI 0.36, 0.47, p < 0.001). People who are more connected to nature reported greater engagement in PEB. Standard tests indicated little effect of publication bias in the sample. There was significant heterogeneity among the samples. Univariate categorical analyses showed that the scales used to measure connection to nature and PEB were significant moderators and explained the majority of the between-study variance. The geographic location of a study, age of participants, and the percentage of females in a study were not significant moderators. We found that a deeper connection to nature may partially explain why some people behave more proenvironmentally than others and that the relationship is ubiquitous. Facilitating a stronger connection to nature may result in greater engagement in PEB and conservation, although more longitudinal studies with randomized experiments are required to demonstrate causation.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesSoftwareFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesResearch Designcomportamiento de conservacióncomportamiento ecológicoconectividad con la naturalezaconnectedness to natureconservation behaviorecological behaviorhuman-nature relationshiprelación humano-naturaleza亲近自然人与自然的关系保护行为生态行为

Identifiers

PMID31251416
PMCPMC7027494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.