Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31250992›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacology in drug development2020

A First-in-Human Phase 1 Randomized Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Study of RPh201 in Healthy Volunteers.

Zadik Hazan, Konstantin Adamsky, Andre Lucassen, Leonard A Levin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01513967 (A Randomized Single and Multiple Dose Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of RPh201 in Healthy Subjects and in Adults With Alzheimer's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01513967 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized Single and Multiple Dose Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of RPh201 in Healthy Subjects and in Adults With Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegenera Pharma LtdRan2012 to 2015Enrolled39ConditionsHealthy Volunteers, Moderate to Severe Alzheimer PatientsArmsRPh201, botanical drug product, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zadik HazanRegenera Pharma Ltd., Ness Ziona, Israel.
Konstantin AdamskyRegenera Pharma Ltd., Ness Ziona, Israel.
Andre LucassenRegenera Pharma Ltd., Ness Ziona, Israel.
Leonard A LevinDepartments of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences and Neurology & Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Mapi Pharma (Israel) · ILMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RPh201 is a drug extracted from gum mastic that has been studied for its anti-inflammatory and antibacterial properties. Preclinical studies of RPh201 demonstrated neuroprotective and neuroenhancing effects. Toxicology studies in animals did not reveal safety concerns or genotoxic effects. This single-center, phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked study in healthy volunteers assessed the safety and tolerability of RPh201, and determined the highest tolerated dose. There were 2 parts: a single ascending dose (SAD) stage, followed by a multiple ascending dose (MAD) stage. Three dosing arms were included in each stage (5 mg, 10 mg, and 20 mg). Safety data in the lower dosing arms were evaluated before higher doses were initiated. Eighteen participants were randomized in the SAD stage: 12 to RPh201 (4 at each dose) and 4 to placebo. Twenty-one participants were randomized in the MAD stage, of which 13 received RPh201. All 18 participants in the SAD stage completed treatment. Sixteen of the 21 participants in the MAD stage completed treatment. The most frequently reported adverse events were local injection site pain and erythema. No deaths or adverse events related to changes in vital signs or electrocardiograms were reported. No occurrences of suicidal behavior or ideation were reported.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMastic ResinMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeuroprotective AgentsProspective StudiesMastic ResinNeuroprotective Agentsgum masticneuroprotectionphase 1RPh201

Identifiers

PMID31250992
PMCPMC7187404
OpenAlexW2953947897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.