ArticlePhysiological reports2019
Mechanisms of tilt-induced vasovagal syncope in healthy volunteers and postural tachycardia syndrome patients without past history of syncope.
Article in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenome-wide association study of male and female sex chromosome trisomies in 1.5 million participants of MVP, FinnGen, and UK Biobank.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Diagnostic efficacy of transcranial Doppler combined with upright tilt test in vasovagal syncope.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Timing of Circulatory and Neurological Events in Syncope.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- Mechanisms of tilt-induced vasovagal syncope in healthy volunteers and postural tachycardia syndrome patients without past history of syncope.Physiological reports · 2019Article
- Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS): A critical assessment.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Upright tilt table testing has been used to test for vasovagal syncope (VVS) but can result in "false positives" in which tilt-induced fainting (tilt+) occurs in the absence of real-world fainting. Tilt+ occurs in healthy volunteers and in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and show enhanced susceptibility to orthostatic hypotension. We hypothesized that the mechanisms for hypotensive susceptibility differs between tilt+ healthy volunteers (Control-Faint (N = 12)), tilt+ POTS patients (POTS-Faint (N = 12)) and a non-fainter control group of (Control-noFaint) (N = 10). Subjects were studied supine and during 70° upright tilt while blood pressure (BP), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR), were measured continuously. Impedance plethysmography estimated regional blood volumes, flows, and vascular resistance. Heart rate was increased while central blood volume was decreased in both Faint groups. CO increased in Control-Faint because of reduced splanchnic vascular resistance; splanchnic pooling was similar to Control-noFaint. Splanchnic blood flow in POTS-Faint decreased and resistance increased similar to Control-noFaint but splanchnic blood volume was markedly increased. Decreased SVR and splanchnic arterial vasoconstriction is the mechanism for faint in Control-Faint. Decreased CO caused by enhanced splanchnic pooling is the mechanism for faint in POTS-Faint. We propose that intrahepatic resistance is increased in POTS-Faint resulting in pooling and that both intrahepatic resistance and splanchnic arterial vasoconstriction are reduced in Control-Faint resulting in increased splanchnic blood flow and reduced splanchnic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.